EA community managers problem?
Recently this was tweeted by community manager: If they don't consider 400k member strong r/battlefield community as part of their feedback loop and they delete/ban all constructive criticism th...
Forum Discussion
@yodddd
After what is going on on Reddit I kind of understand the reluctance of the CMs to avoid that part of the 'feedback loop'. My question is: WHERE do they interact with the community? Did someone count the number of responses they give per hour. Or per day? Are they doing the CM thing in their spare time if they feel like it. Once a week maybe? Or is this supposed to be a full time job? If so, I would expect them to be in the BF forums (where else?) and INTERACT with the community.
They don't have to agree with all the criticism, but they would have to respond and provide feedback in both directions. Can someone please point me to where this interaction is taking place, because it definitely does not happen here.
After what is going on on Reddit I kind of understand the reluctance of the CMs to avoid that part of the 'feedback loop'. My question is: WHERE do they interact with the community? Did someone count the number of responses they give per hour. Or per day? Are they doing the CM thing in their spare time if they feel like it. Once a week maybe? Or is this supposed to be a full time job? If so, I would expect them to be in the BF forums (where else?) and INTERACT with the community.
They don't have to agree with all the criticism, but they would have to respond and provide feedback in both directions. Can someone please point me to where this interaction is taking place, because it definitely does not happen here.
I will have to agree to would rather have had premium like BF 3 & 4 than a live service,
- @CantGetRight "premium" vs. "live-service" is a largely inconsequential difference. "Premium" was functionally live-service, delivering new content regularly for players the same way BF2042's seasons are supposed to. The only difference was that they monetized playable content previously, which resulted in a fragmented playerbase, vs. aiming to monetize cosmetics and other things while delivering content for free now. Which is a successful and very profitable model used in a ton of games.
The only difference is that this is a very different DICE than the DICE that launched BF3/4. It has nothing to do with "live-service" in the slightest, otherwise every other live-service game would be facing the same problems. And they aren't.
