Forum Discussion
Do you have any example of cheaters ? i mean what stats do they have on bftracker ? how do you claim 100% cheat ?
@no_One31 Met this speciment today. Anything unusual that catches your eye?
- sk1lld2 years agoLegend
96% hs/k catches my eye right away! Kind of high accuracy also.
- UP_Hawxxeye2 years agoLegend
@sk1lld
I do not know, even as someone mediocre at sniping I got like 78% headshot ratio on the Gol Magnum. Enders has like 81% HS ratio on his best gun so I guess one can do get suspicious of a 96% when a competitive player is at like 15% less. though he may be a smurf account44% accuracy is not that weird for a sniper rifle though.
I got 71% accuracy on the XCE Bar and 63% on the Gol Magnum.
- sk1lld2 years agoLegend
@UP_Hawxxeye
The way spread works in this game is only one in 5 bullets goes on target so you would expect ~ 25% accuracy and not much higher you add this guy's 43% accuracy with the 96% HS and you got an impossible "Purchased" ability.
JMHO
- ATFGunr2 years agoLegend
@UP_LordPlumber wrote:@no_One31 Met this speciment today. Anything unusual that catches your eye?
Yes, I noticed they suck with SMGs! 🤣
- SpoolaZ2 years agoSeasoned AceWe are at a point where kernel level anti cheats do not work against the new ways of cheating. It's exactly the same situation now, as when BF3 came out.It was the golden age of cheats at the time, where Punkbuster and other ACs were basically completely ineffective against subscription cheats at the time.This was probably also the golden age for all 3rd party Anti cheat sites such as PB-Bans, ACI and other solutions that appeared, when PB alone was not enough.Therefore, AI algorithms must be added to kernel AC, as soon as possible, if you want to keep up with the cheating. I mean, when you have equally competent people, or better to deal with, then it's probably better to try to strike from a different angle, than to take the fight on their terms and always be one step behind.
- 2 years ago@SpoolaZ
You don't need 'kernel level' anticheat at all to detect those a****les.
All you need is gather stats until a certain number of kills per weapon is reached (say 200, to make outliers virtually impossible) and then you can use an extremely simple 'algorithm' (if you can call it that) even the worst of my students could hack in a few minutes would be able to detect those very obvious cheaters. You won't catch wallhackers, but those aimbotters are EASY to detect algorithmically.
The simple fact that this has not been implemented is proof enough to show that Dice does not WANT to ban those players.
I track a few of those players myself and check their stats every 2 days or so to check if their # of kills are increasing (read: if they are still actively playing) and I re-report them EVERY TIME I run across them on the battlefield before leaving the server. They are STILL playing MONTH after I first reported them (only 1 out of approx 10 I monitor stopped playing -- and maybe he just got bored and not even banned).
- 2 years ago
Do you have any example of cheaters ?
- VOLBANKER_PC2 years agoSeasoned Ace
I caught a person redhanded while cheating with the “beacon in wall”-trick.
Sent pm to an EA guy with relevant info incl. where to find my uploaded video.
Never even bothered to open my mail…..
- ElliotLH2 years agoHero+
This is a general reminder to everyone that naming and shaming is against the rules of AHQ. Please do not accuse people of cheating or post their details here as this can lead to action being taken against you.
- IIIWhiteWolfIII2 years agoNew Ace
@ElliotLHI have reported this cheater 20 times, but they haven’t been banned. What should I do?
If you’re protecting players who cheat, then we won’t play either.
- GrizzGolf2 years agoSeasoned Ace
@UP_LordPlumber wrote:@no_One31 Met this speciment today. Anything unusual that catches your eye?
That this person doesnt like LMGs 😃
About Battlefield 2042 General Discussion
Recent Discussions
- 18 minutes ago
- 41 minutes ago
- 2 hours ago