EA doesn't seem to be keen on anti-cheat
The new season has not kept cheaters out; they are present in every game and are increasing in number as time goes by. From last season till now, not only familiar faces are still active in the game...
Forum Discussion
96% hs/k catches my eye right away! Kind of high accuracy also.
@sk1lld
I do not know, even as someone mediocre at sniping I got like 78% headshot ratio on the Gol Magnum. Enders has like 81% HS ratio on his best gun so I guess one can do get suspicious of a 96% when a competitive player is at like 15% less. though he may be a smurf account
44% accuracy is not that weird for a sniper rifle though.
I got 71% accuracy on the XCE Bar and 63% on the Gol Magnum.
@UP_Hawxxeye
The way spread works in this game is only one in 5 bullets goes on target so you would expect ~ 25% accuracy and not much higher you add this guy's 43% accuracy with the 96% HS and you got an impossible "Purchased" ability.
JMHO- @VOLBANKER_PC That is something that blows my mind.
Why is it so hard to code an algorithm that would put players under investigation if their stats begin to look sus.
40% or higher HS rate with a fully automatic AR - player's stats light up and sent for an investigation/manual review.
80% HS rate on over 1000 kills with an AR - Automatic EA account and IP ban.
Same could apply to KPM and accuracy.
@VOLBANKER_PC wrote:
@UP_HawxxeyeHe’s got 82% HS with VHX-D3 ;-)
Case closed…!I had to look up and compare with what is normal for other players and I have to agree that this is quite damning
- @UP_Hawxxeye Almost impossible to play the game without 4 to 5 cheaters in game. Even little bird all headshots and 100 kills, EA seens to do nothing about it. Doenst matter if you report, nothing happens
- @UP_Hawxxeye My accuracy with sniper rifles is around 25-28%, and my HS% around 75% to 85%. But I mainly use 4x scopes, so its more like the options between miss or headshot on long distances.
The HS% of all the fast firing weapons all look suspicious to me.- @kregora But your KPM is only 0.4, meaning if you theoretically were hacking, you would get 7-9 kills in a 20-minute match, so that wouldn't make much difference anyway compared to some bio trash who goes on a rage and kill 70-80 people across the map
If you want some simple heuristics: all players with at least 200 kills and at the same time >40 HS% for any AR or SMG are cheaters. Plain and simple. Same goes for normal accuracy of >30% for AR/SMG, which is not possible. You can't ban players with just 50 kills for the weapon being evaluated as there might be some outliers. But for weapons with 200+ kills, this heuristics is quite robust. Ban all those players. Simple. Why is it not being done, as calling this way simple would still make it sound more complicated than it actually is?
The ONLY reason why those players are not getting banned is BECAUSE EA/DICE DO NOT WANT TO. If there is ANY other explanation that would make sense I would LOVE to hear it.
@ForumUser wrote:If you want some simple heuristics: all players with at least 200 kills and at the same time >40 HS% for any AR or SMG are cheaters. Plain and simple. Same goes for normal accuracy of >30% for AR/SMG, which is not possible. You can't ban players with just 50 kills for the weapon being evaluated as there might be some outliers. But for weapons with 200+ kills, this heuristics is quite robust. Ban all those players. Simple. Why is it not being done, as calling this way simple would still make it sound more complicated than it actually is?
The ONLY reason why those players are not getting banned is BECAUSE EA/DICE DO NOT WANT TO. If there is ANY other explanation that would make sense I would LOVE to hear it.I do see your logic and agree with it. The problem being, we live in an era where landing accusations is an explosive cocktail. I’m refraining from using the word ‘snowflake mentality’ here, but a sensitive player could argue in courts (if not at least the court of public opinion via social media) that he was banned with no evidence. Any lawyer would fall in heavy at the publishing company involved. Hey, teachers get suspended or even fired for saying the ‘wrong’ words in classes… imagine EA/DICE trying to reason and explain to activist-types “we banned the player because statistics show their gameplay is not realistically possible…”
