Endless Matchmaking - Waiting For Players
Hi, It started approximately 2 weeks ago, I click play on Breakthrough (128 players) and I could not find a game at all, I do get a game or two in Conquest (128 players) after long hours of queue. I ...
Forum Discussion
@DuaneDibbley wrote:
@RayD_O1
I have added those 4 links to the first post of new thread.
I am currently just adding the link to your thread now too.
Everyone on here should have a read about a new proposal on this thread :
Re: Concrete and simple to implement proposal that would improve BF2042 TODAY - Answer HQ
Here's why you wont get a server browser.
1. Scoreboard alone has taken several months. A browser is probably more involved than a scoreboard, so you can probably forget about it.
2. Instead of knowing where their barebones maps need cover, they have to ask the community to figure it out for them. Again, a browser is probably even more involved so that doesnt bode well.
3. Having a browser of all active servers exposes the low player counts that they've never admitted to nor spoken about. If theres 4k active players on PC (2k steam 2k origin)( and you install a server browser with crossplay off, 4k / 128 = 31 games running concurrently for 150 countries.
Now if you consider that hypothetical ISNT reality, and those 4k-ish players are divided amongst 64, 128, conquest, breakthrough, and the 2 active portal servers (LMFAO) at any given time, it looks a lot worse. Makes for about 7 active games per mode.
This is all with crossplay off but yeah, a server browser effectively exposes the evidence they probably quietly deny and hope to never have to speak to.
@M0istGamerI hear what you are saying and you may well be proved right, only time will tell.
In the meantime we will keep pushing DICE to implement our request, or at least to get an answer as to why not.
Featured Places
