Endless Matchmaking - Waiting For Players
Hi, It started approximately 2 weeks ago, I click play on Breakthrough (128 players) and I could not find a game at all, I do get a game or two in Conquest (128 players) after long hours of queue. I ...
Forum Discussion
twitter.com/T0TALfps/status/1504437408724664323
Not talked about a whole lot within the community but 100% something we hear and feel. I personally cannot share anything, but know that this has been heard by the team.
At least he has admitted that they are aware of it, in some ways that statement is better than the complete wall of silence.
@RayD_O1 Honestly, I don't even believe that. If they were aware of all these issues and the team knew about them, you'd think that there would be some sense of urgency to address them or at least communicate their plans to address them to the community.
Instead we get continued silence while the game remains abandoned.
Instead we get continued silence while the game remains abandoned.
@edgecrusherO0 wrote:
@RayD_O1Honestly, I don't even believe that. If they were aware of all these issues and the team knew about them, you'd think that there would be some sense of urgency to address them or at least communicate their plans to address them to the community.
Instead we get continued silence while the game remains abandoned.I actually 100% believe they are aware of it but I think there is a gagging order in place.
I I also believe that the lack of a server browser and zero communication is rapidly killing the game and it may be too late to turn it round. I am under no illusions about that.
But as I have said before until they clearly state that we will not be getting server browser / persistent servers I personally intend to keep these threads visible and I hope that everyone who has supported the threads will continue to do so.
- @RayD_O1 I think that the big discussion, inside EA, is about how much investment they are prepared to put into the game. Persistent servers (IMHO) have a better chance of being implemented than a server browser, simply because of the cost implications.
@Lancelot_du_Lac wrote:
@RayD_O1I think that the big discussion, inside EA, is about how much investment they are prepared to put into the game. Persistent servers (IMHO) have a better chance of being implemented than a server browser, simply because of the cost implications.Yes cost is undoubtedly going to be a big factor in their decision making especially with the low player base.
Featured Places
