Forum Discussion

1gamerdad's avatar
1gamerdad
Seasoned Adventurer
4 years ago

Exposure breakthrough first objective needs another capture point

So I've played many matches of breakthrough on exposure and I've come to the conclusion the first objective needs another point. I feel like many times it just becomes a boring stale mate on the very...
discussion
kregora's avatar
kregora
Seasoned Ace
4 years ago
@1gamerdad This sounds like you had very bad experiences as an attacker.
My personal experience is, that I had maybe 1 or 2 matches that didn't progress beyond the first objective. Generally the difficulties to break through is, when the attacker needs to split it forces.
So most unsuccessful attack teams I was on fail, when they have to split forces between two objectives. So in my opinion B1/B2 is the challenge on Exposure, not A1.
If you already struggle at A1, B1 and B2 is nearly impossible to overcome.
1gamerdad's avatar
1gamerdad
Seasoned Adventurer
4 years ago
@kregora incorrect, I've had both bad experiences as an attacker and a defender. When you defend it so well it doesn't advance it becomes a snooze fest. When you are on an attacking team and can't advance it also becomes a snooze fest. Or not even adding a point, maybe adding more transport helis or something to the first objective. When it doesn't advance it becomes boring either way.
  • kregora's avatar
    kregora
    Seasoned Ace
    4 years ago
    @1gamerdad To me that is the same situation where the attacker isn't even trying, or wasted all vehicles by trying to road kill defenders.

    I very often end up in repurpose repo attacker vehicles to park them behind some cover on the defenders side. Just to limit the attackers access to vehicles.

    The HIND already is very annoying, there shouldn't be a second one.
    • XSive_Drez's avatar
      XSive_Drez
      4 years ago
      @kregora wrote:
      I very often end up in repurpose repo attacker vehicles to park them behind some cover on the defenders side. Just to limit the attackers access to vehicles.

      The HIND already is very annoying, there shouldn't be a second one.

      Yeah, that always annoys me when I'm the attacker. I end up spending so much time as Les trying to 'reclaim' those assets lol.

      And, I agree there should be no second Hind. One is quite enough on that map.

      Also, one objective is fine IMO. Two would be too much. I think stage progression should get steadily more difficult and I think 1 A and 2 B does that well. Maybe 2 for C but that's tricky because I see teams stall there all the time.

      • kregora's avatar
        kregora
        Seasoned Ace
        4 years ago
        @XSive_Drez wrote:
        Yeah, that always annoys me when I'm the attacker. I end up spending so much time as Les trying to 'reclaim' those assets lol.

        You are welcome 👿

About Battlefield 2042 General Discussion

Discuss the latest news and game information around Battlefield 2042 in the community forums.16,119 PostsLatest Activity: 19 minutes ago