False positive bans
I just got a false positive banned from BF2042 this morning, while I was not even home... how is this even possible? I guess its rip my ultimate edition. I believe another user @Gryphonv got the sa...
Forum Discussion
@ItsOnlyM3-NL wrote:
Ah there is our troll again with the "This is actively encouraged so the cheat provider can then work away around to circumvent the anti cheat to keep one step ahead."
Dude seriously
He's not wrong though.
That is the one and only reason companies don't specify bans.
They don't want to give cheaters too much info to compare as that could lead to them figuring out what hacks are detecable and how they are detected.
Sadly that policy will negatively effect people who were unfairly banned to as they can't get aswers either.
@BizzyVaping wrote:
@ItsOnlyM3-NL wrote:
Ah there is our troll again with the "This is actively encouraged so the cheat provider can then work away around to circumvent the anti cheat to keep one step ahead."
Dude seriouslyHe's not wrong though.
That is the one and only reason companies don't specify bans.
They don't want to give cheaters too much info to compare as that could lead to them figuring out what hacks are detecable and how they are detected.
Sadly that policy will negatively effect people who were unfairly banned to as they can't get aswers either.
i don’t think that entirely correct. If the EAC banning integration is correctly working and picking cheats like aimbots and banning these cheaters, their entire subscribed user based would be banned and they would be complaining to the cheat makers. So they would know straight away their cheats are been detected.
I see no harm in at least giving banned users little
more info why they were banned. Was it for cheats, exploit or misconduct in chat. At least that way any falsely banned users at least have something to on and try and prove their innocent.
Featured Places
