Forum Discussion
Companies not unlike EA constantly brag about how they solve tough problems, so I think it's entirely fair to tell them to put their money where their mouth is. This is a real problem, but no meaningful action has ever been taken on it and it's long-past time somebody do so. As far as the wider gaming community, devs talk. They look at what other devs have done and how it worked and try to see if they can implement the same systems. GDC revolves around this, and it only takes one system to work for others to then start copying and remixing it for their communities. In academia we do this via publishing our research. We expect and encourage other researchers to read and run with it in almost whatever direction they deem useful.
I'm sure they already have some of this done just due to data retention laws being fairly different between just the US and EU, but that's probably solely from a marketing/data sale for advertising basis.
Looking at the mess that is core communication platforms as an example. (reddit, twitter, facebook etc)
They're very very slowly moving towards making a choice on moderation vs "free" but even they, who literally make their money on people communicating on their platforms, are incredibly timid about policing that content because the moment they set a standard or take responsibility for policing "bad" content, the amount of new hires required becomes a not-insignificant change to their bottom line, not to mention it opens them to a host of legal challenges in many countries.
(See Australia's recent "twitter is responsible for the content on their platform" kerfuffle and the fallout/debate around that as an example)
For what it's worth, i think with all the scrutiny said communications platforms are under and how quite a few countries are looking at how they can make those platforms liable for their content is going to force through a change with EA long before debates on forums like this will, because the second a country requires communication channels to be moderated, it'll affect games as well as platforms like twitter etc.
The only downside to that bit is that most of the more "progressive" countries when it comes to these things are fairly small, so until some larger countries decide to pull the finger out and EA would really notice it if they didn't comply, i think it will be next to impossible that any real change happens.
Until then most companies will talk a big game, and do the absolute minimum required to claim compliance at the same time.
Again though, for now we have self-policed communities and guilds/clans, and that does count for something.
- 4 years ago
@FringerunnerI'm not sure if I really want to dive into the content moderation debate since that's outside the scope of anything I'm proposing or asking for. I also want to be clear that I'm not even asking anybody to be compelled to hand over a an ID of any type. This is a suggestion of an option to be platform-segregated by age and that's it. Finding something workable for most nations will definitely raise privacy concerns about what data is retained by who and for how long, but that's a sort of logistical detail that comes only after anyone even decides they're willing to take on this problem. I think EA can if they cared. I know it's an expense they don't want. But I'm advocating for me and others who want this problem solved so it doesn't do us much good to worry about EA's profit concerns.
- Fringerunner4 years agoSeasoned Ace@TuskegeeHeir No issue with that and go for it, just pointing out the logistical issues let alone the ethical ones.
As i said, in theory i'm all for it 🙂