Game is so dumbed down. There is 0 enjoyment
I have given this game around 200 hours and ive been a big fan of earlier games. Especially Battlefield 2 and 3. This modern version of a war-game is so dumbed down, there is so much design flaws...
Forum Discussion
@Man_iLoveFishing
It does indeed , Because even when its the Lowest time in my area BF 2042 still does not plummet like BFV numbers does .. So basically what it mean is that a particular region of the world boost BFV numbers for a short period of time .. While BF2042 numbers remain somewhat healthy and stable troughout the day .. thats the point .. An average players play about 2 hours a day and steamcharts isnt total players but concurent players wich mean players who play at the same time when you check it out
Steam chart at this very second
@Stew360time to loose that foil hat.
Edit: look at 30day loss in %. And if steam really refunds, ouch.
@Man_iLoveFishing
Here ill post the Lows of both games wait for it friend Player peak wich mean concurents players playing at the same time is irrevelant .. BFV has HUGE spikes for not long then dips a lots in the low 2000 while 2042 is still stable- @Stew360 No don't waste ur time. Could really care less. Game is not doing fine, period.
@Man_iLoveFishing
LOL planetside 2 have about 1000 to 3000 players on steam and its very alive and receive constant updates .. Insurgency sandstorm is having about 1000 to 3000 concurent players and is doing fine ..
Of course 2042 does not bring APEX legends numbers or Warzone or Fortnite numbers .. But BF isnt a enjoyyable game to watch peoples play as a stream , Battle royal games are the " gold standard " for streamers and the type of game that attract peoples the most .. Also colorfull games with silly outfits and dances .. Because they can get viewership from childs and so on ..
For being 2 months after a rough launch the game is doing fine .. And if the devs still keep growing the game . adding new features , bug fixing , improoving performances etc.. the game will regrow ..
Apex legends as been in a very low playerbase era at some point after a very strong and polish start ... they lost 90% of their players for a time and then look where it is now ? Its one of the most played game on steam not even counting consoles and origin ...As long as 2042 dont drop into Sub 1000 it would be fine
- @Stew360 I cared, so 5,5k vs 2,5k lows, really think that's healthy chart for 2 months old game vs 3 years?
@Man_iLoveFishing
For a playable game that was sold 10$ vs another on sale at 50$ and one having insanely high Hardware and ram speed requirement and the other can almost run on a potatoe then yes its pretty fineAlso its the average troughout the day that matter and BF2042 as a more stable playerbase
@Stew360You are probably new to battlefield games, 2042 is for sure worst one they made till now from 2002.
On image you show us here you can see 100k as all time peak for bf2042, thats only cause noone expected that it will be one more fail in a row (bf1 and bf5 were also fails) so ppl like me bought it in good faith and could not imagine 3rd fail in a row. In few weeks you will see that bf5 has more players per day.
I have some +50 friends on bf withing Origin, some 10 of us bought bf2042 and noone plays it any more we are all back on bf4 and bf5 making jokes about bf2042 so that our other friends dont throw $ like we did.
