give us back 3 c5 ...
Give assault back 3 c5 and stop catering for blind and dumb drivers would like to say that flanking him when no one else would even bother to do anything and only having 2 c5 when hes on his ow...
Forum Discussion
@GSTARSTONER
Do you have something against using the Engineer class? They are the ones that still have 3 c5 for the reason that it is their job to take out armor. Plus if you pick Liz, you have 2 missiles + 3 c5 or AT mines, +1 AT grenade if you prefer it over smoke.
On the update 7.1 the engineers get +1 M5 or RPG over what they have now. This means that Crawford might be seen carrying up to 5 M5/RPG missiles on his back at a time.
Btw if you are the only one doing the right thing in your entire team, you got to accept that you are fighting an uphill battle when it comes to dealing with with something like a tank which is limited to few units available per team. Remember that you are supposed to have several people helping you and if you don't it is a team issue, which can only be mitigated by playing with a platoon or several friends.
I still believe, that C5 or C4 in previous titles was the makeshift option for non-engineers to sabotage vehicles. The engineer has access to the "professional" options for that specific task.
That is why I think that giving the 2042 engineers access to a "full" set of C5 packages a most stupid design decision.
In my opinion C5 access should be removed from the engineer class.
- @kregora Yes, it was the makeshift option, not the primary way to kill a vehicle halfway across the map by flying at it (at a speed faster than any ground vehicle!) which supercedes engineers.
It is not a makeshift option to have 3 C5s on 3 out of 4 assaults, and to a lesser extent 1 of 4 recons, where Rao can hack a vehicle to massively slow it down and throw a smoke to hide himself.
