give us back 3 c5 ...
Give assault back 3 c5 and stop catering for blind and dumb drivers would like to say that flanking him when no one else would even bother to do anything and only having 2 c5 when hes on his ow...
Forum Discussion
I still believe, that C5 or C4 in previous titles was the makeshift option for non-engineers to sabotage vehicles. The engineer has access to the "professional" options for that specific task.
That is why I think that giving the 2042 engineers access to a "full" set of C5 packages a most stupid design decision.
In my opinion C5 access should be removed from the engineer class.
@kregora Yes, it was the makeshift option, not the primary way to kill a vehicle halfway across the map by flying at it (at a speed faster than any ground vehicle!) which supercedes engineers.
It is not a makeshift option to have 3 C5s on 3 out of 4 assaults, and to a lesser extent 1 of 4 recons, where Rao can hack a vehicle to massively slow it down and throw a smoke to hide himself.
It is not a makeshift option to have 3 C5s on 3 out of 4 assaults, and to a lesser extent 1 of 4 recons, where Rao can hack a vehicle to massively slow it down and throw a smoke to hide himself.
