Forum Discussion
RanzigeRidder2
2 years agoLegend
@av3sto And how exactly is EA making money from getting cheaters banned?
- UP_Hawxxeye2 years agoLegend@RanzigeRidder2
I believe that the assumption is that they buy the game again to continue cheating or something.
But from what I hear, the worst cheaters are just using stolen accounts.- RanzigeRidder22 years agoLegend@UP_Hawxxeye I don't believe that is a solid assumption. As you said the worst cheaters have ways around this and won't even get caught, they spend their money on cheat software and stolen accounts not on EA. The ones that get caught and get banned most likely give up on this game and try their luck elsewhere instead of reinvesting in this game again.
If EA would really make money out of banning cheaters they would do much more effort and do so, as we all know how much they like money.- 2 years ago
if so then why is there only "a way around" when it comes to gaming software? why dont you have such things on software where you can actually make/steal real money?
no they wouldnt, bcs if you ban someone instantly they wouldnt come back anymore (no dopamine) but if you leave a tiny gap open, let them play for a while and then ban... its the dopamine rush that makes cheaters buy again. since counterstrike 1.6.
- RaginSam2 years agoSeasoned Ace
@UP_Hawxxeye wrote:
@RanzigeRidder2
I believe that the assumption is that they buy the game again to continue cheating or something.
But from what I hear, the worst cheaters are just using stolen accounts.Games go on sale, also you can use the EA play for $5. Some people have a lot of disposable income and spending $100 on a years worth of accounts for a game probably isn't a big deal to them.
- 2 years ago
bcs they need to buy the game again?
- RanzigeRidder22 years agoLegend@av3sto See my other reply. I hardly think they make any money on that. The rationale will be that they don't want to SPEND any money on anti cheat.
They will have conducted a cost benefit-analysis on developing/buying anti cheat measures and concluded it does not bring enough additional revenue to justify the investment.