Forum Discussion
Funny thing this game is targeting those "generation z". And whoever criticized the game got accused of being what you call a "boomer". I am 38 and sadly for me, i bought the game on Origin so there's no way for me to voice my negative experience & opinion on this.
I'm 38 years old and played the hell of every Battlefield game released on PC but what they've done here killed everything that made it a great game that stands out among a competition to appeal to "gen z" audience and casual players.
But i'm an old grumpy person so what do i know.
- 4 years ago@MajDroid
But i'm an old grumpy person so what do i know.
—————————————————————-
You are not alone. I'm a dinosaur.
My gut told me this would not be a traditional BF game, but more a wannabe BR/COD game, so I did not preorde. But the portal can eventually save the game. So I wait and observe. Who knows, maybe more content will come to the portal.- 4 years ago
BF2042 and the Battlefield spirit appear to have been killed in it's crib already years back...
All the missing functions and bugs are obvious now because the majority of the EA developers involved are literally BF newbies!
A sad read on BF2042 feedback from a EA Game Changer: (and explains why most Game Changers suddenly have vanished...)
https://www.reddit.com/r/battlefield2042/comments/qwfoof/a_battlefield_2042_steam_review/
- 4 years ago
Well for me the terrible reviews the game is getting are justified, the game sucks imo as battlefield games go, the weapons suck, a sub is the best weapon, the maps look like a 2002 game, the guns spray and punish good aim. So they basically took a less polished version of battlefront 2 and made it a 1st person shooter in a battlefield game. Sticking with cod and bf5. Did I say this game blows. If anything it was made for the boomers, zero comp.
- 4 years ago@SirBobdk I don't think its catering to anyone I think the studio is evolving and taking risks . Just as halo and previous other titles have . I think it has traditional elements but with a new stance on what the future could be .
- 4 years ago
@TyrantLogic wrote:
@SirBobdkI don't think its catering to anyone I think the studio is evolving and taking risks . Just as halo and previous other titles have . I think it has traditional elements but with a new stance on what the future could be .They do not evolve if you see the long list of things that are missing in the game. There are far fewer opportunities than we have had in the past.
- 4 years ago@MajDroid games cater to trends these days instead of innovation. So you get less than 10000 players after this is all said and done between pc/ps5/xsx and old gen to fill lobbies in a months time. I bet you are already seeing the same people in your lobbies on 1st weekend of official release....probably nothing....lol
- 4 years ago@MajDroid Tough to admit I have a couple years on you, but here I am on a videogame forum lobbying for proper implementation on k&m on xbox. I haven't given up on this being a great game and I won't until I see EA's official stance on the topic. OP I'm glad you are having a good experience!
-fellow old grump- 4 years ago
So we have a great value battlefield. Also to mention the sheer number of things they took out of the game that previous games had. This feels like the alpha.
About Battlefield 2042 General Discussion
Recent Discussions
- 33 minutes ago
- 2 hours ago
- 3 hours ago
- 7 hours ago