Hit reg issues, TTK vs TTD inconsistency.
Just left another game for the same reason as i left the last 3 games. you can shoot a whole clip on an enemy, well aimed, only getting 2 or 3 hitmarkers, the enemy turns around, 1 or 2 bullets and i...
Forum Discussion
@cyej6kkea5u6Low latency mode in Nvidias control-panel is for DirectX 9/11 only, not for DirectX 12. 2042 uses DX12.
Reflex / Boost has an effect on DX12 though (Boost is power-management and disables dynamic lowering of GPU-clocks).
The UI is awful and is a bad console-port. But this should have no effect on the game-engine. The TTK/TTD-problems have been in Frostbite for a long time, they only seems to have gotten worse in 2042 than in previous titles (especially compared to BF1/BFV).
The TTK/TTD-problems have been in Frostbite for a long time, they only seems to have gotten worse in 2042
That's unfortunate because I stopped playing Battlefield 3 (THREE!) because of the terrible TTK/TTD problems. I can't believe they're still happening.
- @Jubei-Dakuan BF4 has 60 hz tick-rate (instead of 10 in BF3) and the netcode is awful. BF4 was still a big improvement compared to BF3 though.
BF2042 feels like BF4, a game that is almost 10 years old... @Jubei-Dakuan Battlefield 3 was really bad when it comes to netcode, the lag compensation was very obvious in this game. But the positive about it was that it was pretty consistent and predictable combined with the supressions system it allowed you to adapt your playstyle to take advantage or at least work with the flow of the netcode. In Battlefield 2042 it's just so inconsistent you start to doubt yourself from one play session to the next.
Man that’s really a shame because the Battlefield games are the best looking with the largest maps. I’ve been playing Battlefield V lately but the player count and hackers are making me want to switch to 2042. It sounds like it’s completely broken though. That’s really too bad because there aren’t any other large scale FPS out right now.
- @Ironhead841 Oh I loved BF4, probably the best BF-game overall. Still play it sometimes to this day.
But BF4s netcode is pretty bad and 2042s netcode is just as bad. @Jubei-Dakuan2042 is a "bad"/weird BF-game, but it is still a BF-game.
It plays more like BF4 than BFV (faster paced) and the TTK is very fast compared to BFV.
The netcode is pretty bad and the specialist system is weird, but you can still have fun in 2042. The new 'class-system' has made the game feel more like BF than ever.Many of the issues in 2042 are the same as in older titles with unbalanced vehicle/infantry gameplay, meta-weapons etc.
Cheaters are very rare in 2042, I have only seen very few cheaters (less than 10), during my time with 2042 (nearly 500 hours). EAC works better than any other anti-cheat-system Dice has used before.
If you can get 2042 for cheap, I would say it could be worth trying.I’ll probably snag it the next time it goes on sale under $20, but my PC is old.
Well I am back to feeling like I am getting killed faster again
