It's nice to see someone somewhere is listening.
And when I didn't think we'd be getting any changes with the devs being on break for holidays.
Lol still waiting on an apology about making us pay to be beta testers but whatever
Going to be interesting to see how this plays. I myself love the 128 players most of the time. Only if I'm in a discord squad with voice though.
I feel like 48 v. 48 may be the magic spot for 2042 maps. 96 players total
Thinking about it really just brings the elephant to light. We need voice coms asap
Are the maps smaller as well or is it just 64 players on 128 player size maps?
It’s nice that they are listening but the Maps are still huge and it feels like they didn’t cut down the vehicle spam from 128. Vehicles every second of the match at every location on the map. Infantry play still suffering as a result.
In addition most of the objectives are still located at the same horrible locations, many totally void of cover. As a result vehicles no where near that objective are farming enemy infantry that are located inside the objective by the dozen. It’s so bad it’s unbelievable.
That desert map spawned me in as a defender on the objective that’s located in the flower bed. Literally 3 enemy tanks, 2 enemy helicopters and about 20 enemy infantry were set up in the buildings and sand dunes overlooking this HORRIBLY designed objective and they all instantly deleted me from existence the millisecond I spawned in. Who in their right mind would think this is a well designed objective? And how about that spawn location?
It’s great that DICE is seeing how terrible the 128 experience is, however the core issues remain. Too many vehicles, poor map design(lack of cover for infantry!) and poor spawn in logic still plagues game play.
@Psychopski wrote:It’s nice that they are listening but the Maps are still huge and it feels like they didn’t cut down the vehicle spam from 128. Vehicles every second of the match at every location on the map. Infantry play still suffering as a result.
In addition most of the objectives are still located at the same horrible locations, many totally void of cover. As a result vehicles no where near that objective are farming enemy infantry that are located inside the objective by the dozen. It’s so bad it’s unbelievable.
That desert map spawned me in as a defender on the objective that’s located in the flower bed. Literally 3 enemy tanks, 2 enemy helicopters and about 20 enemy infantry were set up in the buildings and sand dunes overlooking this HORRIBLY designed objective and they all instantly deleted me from existence the millisecond I spawned in. Who in their right mind would think this is a well designed objective? And how about that spawn location?
It’s great that DICE is seeing through light but the core issues with too many vehicles, poor map design(lack of cover for infantry!) and poor spawn in logic still plagues game play.
Yeah maps are still trash. Discarded is even worse with 64 players in my opinion. Performance still sucks.
I have just been on 30 minuts ago and didn't see any 64 player option?
Thanks to no server browser you can’t find Conquest 64 that’s up as well for next gen consoles. Oh how DICE keeps screwing themselves and fans.
You have to use that one option to swap game modes from the main page. I accidentally tapped it and found 64 player Conquest.
Seriously guys a functional SERVER BROWSER, FOR ALL GAME MODES, that actually works. The Portal Browser is terrible. There’s no way to sort servers by players or ping! Look to the BF4 server browser if you need to know what a descent server browser looks like.
I am glad to see this added, However really "limited time" surely I am not the only one here that thinks these modes need to be permanent.......
Why only temporary?
