Forum Discussion
@VOLBANKER_PC
I'm not saying that there are not clans who enjoy the "bullying" of gate-crashing a server on mass and, but in all of my years playing all versions, I can't say I've left a game feeling particularly abused. I think there is something about balance that could be done, as you say, but also how Dice, encourage and reward collaborative play. TBH, PTT really puts me off. I think coms should be open. I've played a lot of Warzone (waiting for 2042!), and love it when you get into a four-up with people who talk, and d'you know, I always get further in the game when that happens.
Clan tags are irrelevant. When people want bigger squads or linking squads so even when team rebalance occurs they are not split up or want allow team switching. This is the problem is the defenders of I want to play with friends are the same as those exploit it.
3rd party comms has more impact on team performance yet the only realistic counter is the comms rose but when every this is talked about, I have seen comments like it is not needed, join a 3rd party comms or join a clan this fails to understanding why people don't want to join.
DICE needs to just fix the comms rose and start cratering to the broader community not just groups that play on 3rd party comms.
- Trokey665 years agoSeasoned Ace
One thing that people seem to be forgetting.....
We were all randoms once.
The vast majority of my friends list were 'randoms' who joined squads and played well together. Friend requests are exchanged and years later we have a core of 6-10 people who, when the mood takes us can play well.
When in multiple squads, we allow the balancer to do its thing so sometimes we are all on the same side, sometimes against but always a hoot.
I would not want to see ANYTHING that jepodises that fun.
About Battlefield 2042 General Discussion
Recent Discussions
- 44 seconds ago
- 3 hours ago