I genuinely love AoW
And the massive battles it brings. I've been very critical of 2042 since release, but I firmly believe 128 players and the massive warfare it brings is a step in the right direction for Battlefield, ...
Forum Discussion
I'm glad you are enjoying it.
For me, 128 player breakthrough is a mess and the 128 player maps would be better played with 64 players.
@Noodlesocks wrote:I'm glad you are enjoying it.
For me, 128 player breakthrough is a mess and the 128 player maps would be better played with 64 players.
Much agreed @Noodlesocks ,
Though sad as those geographic large maps could and should have catered perfectly fine to a 128 player mode!
But the culprit is simply the much cheap discounted bare-bones scraping the barrel version we have now of all the BF2042 maps...
They are simply barren of contents and empty for any soul or fun across the vast majority of the geography they stretches across. So at most we just have a few hundred meters around/near each contested flag zone where we have some contents to use for strategic gameplay and exchanges with our friends and foes in the game.
A real downer for us that have known the greatness of many past BF games and epic maps in those which cater to endless variations of battle strategy/approach and long lasting fun...!
Featured Places
