Forum Discussion

Cemtexx's avatar
Cemtexx
3 years ago

I will push this till it is added, Console M&K...Where and when? Devs, welcome

Legit question here, I don't want any stupid answers like "Get a pc" or "Turn cross platform off" or anything similar, its is a cross platform game without a basic Cross Platform feature. But when a...
discussion
xXHappy_PuppyXx's avatar
xXHappy_PuppyXx
Rising Ace
3 years ago
@BiscuitTheCat Ya they need to remove PC from crossplay. It's the only way to balance competitive play. Its just not mnk vs controller. PC have the potential of double to triple the frame rate of consoles have higher resolution, more graphical tweaks and settings. They're never going to balance the two unless they limit PC to the same resolution, framerate and control input. There is no way they will do that as the pc community would throw a hissy fit if they were limited to 50 to 60 fps.

The best option is to remove PC from crossplay or make console vs console the defualt crossplay and you have to manually opt into pc crossplay.
Cemtexx's avatar
Cemtexx
3 years ago
@xXHappy_PuppyXx It is interesting that someone has mentioned this, I can use COD MW and Cold war as an example, I play on the XSX with mostly PC players on those games, and use M&K also, and most time play with a 60Hz monitor (going to upgrade to 120 soon) and I can still keep up with them whether in a large ground war game or in the smaller competitive games like CTF or Demolition despite playing at half the refresh rate, but graphically the same.

I wouldn't say visually there's that big of an advantage for a BF game (Each PC rig is different) but M&K is what the biggest factor is when it comes to playing competitively or casually.
  • xXHappy_PuppyXx's avatar
    xXHappy_PuppyXx
    Rising Ace
    3 years ago
    @Cemtexx cod has extremely aggressive aim assit to compensate while 2042s aim assit doesnt even work most of the time.

    Framerate makes a huge difference. If it wasnt there would be no need to have 120 fps. Even so ps5/series x are lock at 60.. hell they barely can get to 60fps without dynamic resolution scaling kicking in.

    COD for all its faults is way better optimized for both PC and Console.
    • Cemtexx's avatar
      Cemtexx
      3 years ago
      @xXHappy_PuppyXx I know it can make a difference, but you got to have the rig / console to do so, there's a good amount of games that do allow for 120 FPS on console now but they normally sacrifice resolution from 4k to 1080P or vica versa, Example: Cyberpunk 2077

      But having a game that does cross platform but only allows M&K support on the native platform (PC) and not the other 2 (XSX & PS5) then your seriously putting those players at a disadvantage.

      Yes the XSX and PS5 can run BF2042 at 4K with 60+ (120) FPS with the correct monitor / tv, but without mouse and keyboard us players are limited by the controller sensitivity speed, not our own reactions like what M&K allow PC players to react with due to mouse DPI and game sensitivity working together.
      • xXHappy_PuppyXx's avatar
        xXHappy_PuppyXx
        Rising Ace
        3 years ago
        @Cemtexx I'm not sure where you got your info but 2042 absolutely does NOT support 120fps no matter what TV you use on Series X/PS5. 120fps doesnt magically activate with the right TV. 2042 is lock to a maximum of 60fps on both next gen consoles.

        Also we are talking about Batllefield not other games.

        It would be better for all console players for pc to be removed from crossplay. That way everyone is playing on a level field.

Featured Places

Recent Discussions