Forum Discussion
It's already dead with the branding of previous game features as "legacy features" that warrant a discussion on whether to be put in the game
- snakeeyes004 years agoSeasoned Hotshot
Well that pretty much seals it for me, I wont' be purchasing any additional Battlefield games going forward.
Real shame too, as I really enjoyed the old style game play. Already stopped playing 2042 and went back to BF4.
- 4 years ago
Well with CoD dude now leading the franchise, I have ZERO trust or faith in anything EA. 2042 may sell well but the player count is dropping fast and their next game - I will neither preorder nor support them. I wish a different developer would see the chance and make a good BF clone....
- 4 years ago
Ok I am putting on my optimistic hat here for everyone who wants a battlefield with traditional classes and a more grounded core experience.
They have just announced they will be creating a battlefield universe so that implies more than one type of battlefield game.
Given the overall reception to traditional classes and armies being removed I suspect EA will realise there is consumer demand within the battlefield playerbase for a more traditional core battlefield game type.
So given that they intend to expand the battlefield universe I can't see why they will not offer different game types and one of them will be a traditional battlefield experience.
So all is not lost, though I think you may have to wait because 2042 is not going to change its core design.
- cornybbq24 years agoSeasoned Ace@snakeeyes00 I will re-buy battlefield 4 tomorrow. Hope it still has an active community…
- FlibberMeister4 years agoSeasoned Ace
@cornybbq2 wrote:
@snakeeyes00I will re-buy battlefield 4 tomorrow. Hope it still has an active community…
If your on PlayStation, check out the server browser(lol) so 722 CTC L150 servers. 722 is always full. Hardcore for the win.