Lack of cover in BF2042 Maps
Since the release of the game, many people are complaining about how little cover maps provide for such an amounts of players. Empty spaces on the map that occupies a lot of space but doesn't bring m...
Forum Discussion
"The maps have been flat and empty for a long time."
Yes, there are maps like that, for sure in previous BF titles.
However there are others which provide more solid and interesting game play. IMO maps like:
Devastation
Rotterdam
Provence
Amiens
Even the more open country maps in BF 5, and especially BF 1, are more interesting IMO than those in 2042.
Monte Grappa
St. Quentin Scar
Argonne Forrest
Rupture
The thing about the previous maps is that they had cohesion in design and placement of features, which contributed to good game play. 2042 maps appear discontiguous with features and focal points separated by large amounts of open space. They lack harmony and synthesis and this impacts game play accordingly.
@FlatChat Devastation, Breakaway and the one with the wall all look great and have a lot of varied structures and terrain.
I predict they will be looked back on fondly.
Then I'd rate Orbital and Manifest as good maps.
Dustbowl and Kaleidoscope are kind of meh, hate the skyscrapers gameplay vibe. So tedious, but that's me.
I predict they will be looked back on fondly.
Then I'd rate Orbital and Manifest as good maps.
Dustbowl and Kaleidoscope are kind of meh, hate the skyscrapers gameplay vibe. So tedious, but that's me.
@Tank2042ManAgree, skyscrapers do little more than shield helos from missile locks...
Manifest is the other reasonable map in 2042 along with Discarded, IMO the others are atrocious. But neither is on a par with the best maps from BF1 and V
