Forum Discussion
5 years ago
@ChrisAWJBethel In regards to FPS games, PC will always be superior. In terms of RPGs, I will happily admit that Playstation has some of the best titles in the market. I will also admit that I'm not going to listen to your points because you can go to Walmart right this instance and buy a $300 dollar laptop with 500gb of space on it that can run most games out right now on low settings and play at a better FPS rate than a console can, giving you the better edge needed to compete. That's also more readily available than a console. Cheaper too.
I'm also genuinely aware that hackers and cheaters are present in every game, multiplayer and single player. I don't think about it. I put up with it and move on like an adult and don't whine about it. You are also right that graphics don't make the game. However, Battlefield and their Frostbite engine, the graphics do make the game. It's the reason buildings can collapse, explosions can cause holes, vehicles to structurally fall apart when shot, etc. etc. The Frostbite engine is also a major reason Battlefield's sound is so good and why it sounds so realistic when you don't hear a tank firing until the shell is already about to impact by you.
You're paying for the engine and the brand. You're not necessarily paying for the game itself. Those of us preordering or already have preordered, know this. And my comment you quoted being "selfish and egotistical," isn't in regards to being "only a PC gamer" saying that. All gaming companies do that when it's meant to be played as mainly a multiplayer game and not single player. It's done making money. It's the same concept as it's cheaper to tear down a run down building and rebuild it than to renovate it.
I'm also genuinely aware that hackers and cheaters are present in every game, multiplayer and single player. I don't think about it. I put up with it and move on like an adult and don't whine about it. You are also right that graphics don't make the game. However, Battlefield and their Frostbite engine, the graphics do make the game. It's the reason buildings can collapse, explosions can cause holes, vehicles to structurally fall apart when shot, etc. etc. The Frostbite engine is also a major reason Battlefield's sound is so good and why it sounds so realistic when you don't hear a tank firing until the shell is already about to impact by you.
You're paying for the engine and the brand. You're not necessarily paying for the game itself. Those of us preordering or already have preordered, know this. And my comment you quoted being "selfish and egotistical," isn't in regards to being "only a PC gamer" saying that. All gaming companies do that when it's meant to be played as mainly a multiplayer game and not single player. It's done making money. It's the same concept as it's cheaper to tear down a run down building and rebuild it than to renovate it.
5 years ago
@Mephiticshepard Everyone doesn't play battlefield for the graphics. Everyone plays battlefill for the 00x atmosphere. If you played 1942 or Vietnam or 2
or in 2142 you will understand. Everyone dreams of playing offline with bots. The company became the killer of those times. I'm glad they removed it, I'm waiting for them to replace it with offline mode with bots. Just a beginner will be able to feel the game with bots after that go online. Or a veteran of the game.
or in 2142 you will understand. Everyone dreams of playing offline with bots. The company became the killer of those times. I'm glad they removed it, I'm waiting for them to replace it with offline mode with bots. Just a beginner will be able to feel the game with bots after that go online. Or a veteran of the game.