Forum Discussion
@Trokey66 wrote:
@lzilchetl wrote:
@AristarhUcolov2 wrote:
@Its_Travis_199
It turns out ........ back to 2010 (Boring time without offline bots = () This is no longer considered a gift for fans. Since all fans dreamed of offline Conquest. For this, Battlefield was famous in the 00s. Single-player mode in Conquest ...We needed Offline Conquest.I never. Never even thought of it. So that's all fans -1.
-2 and I strongly suspect a lot more too.
-3, and counting... BF is famous for its large scale multiplayer world with infantry and vehicles. All the single player parts from the past were at best terribly mediocre, all bolted on as limited add-ons.
I think the Bot Matches are better than the Campaigns because they give Infinite Replayability.
Meanwhile the Campaigns were only good once and then pointless after that.
- 4 years ago@Jesse165 All this time I wrote about matches with bots (Conquest is a mode with capturing flags) Offline Conquest as Battlefield 1942,2,Vietnam,2142
- 4 years ago
@Jesse165 wrote:I think the Bot Matches are better than the Campaigns because they give Infinite Replayability.
Meanwhile the Campaigns were only good once and then pointless after that.
The campaigns were only played to collect those dog tags and complete the assignments in the game. And even that was bugged as hell !
Getting familiar with the guns, the accessories; practicing in the vehicles etc were all to be done on the test range.
But now that is gone, we definitely need the solo player environment practicing against the AI Bots, to avoid the flood of newbies aka crashing a full heli into the nearest building upon take off from base...
- 4 years ago@CyberDyme Old school bf is nice. I would like to return to the 2000s. I would start playing Codename Eagle or Battlefield 1942,Vietnam,2,2142.