Why not ?
Are the DEVS listening / reading about this topic or not ?
i hope they are
I have to admit, I don't agree. I don't want a Battlefield 4 remaster. And I don't think DICE wants this either. It is a boring proposal, doing the same over and over... Will just bore the Playerbase and the developers.
I think, the game can change in many aspects, I also don't think that specialists are bad in general. But it was no change, made to improve the gameplay. Or it didn't worked out, as DICE thought it would. Either the motivation for the change was wrong one, or it was not tested enough to seen that it is not beneficial or hasn't reworked to do so.
The design process for such a big project is not just determine something and miracle something good comes out, it has to be tested, reviewed, changed and so on, or canceled if nothing helps.
I am not against 128 players for example, but if I can't get the performance right or the flow on the maps, then I should not implement it.
I think, if the focus lies more on the gameplay and less on making money, or bringing it for the next Christmas... I am fully for more creative changes for the next Battlefield.
What could be an option... A Remake of BF4, with a separate team, so a separate game. Maybe with some improvements but many nostalgia. But I think it would be lazy, to just copy everything from BF4. I have had enough of lazy rip offs on the gaming market (BF2042, World of Warcraft, Overwatch 2, the next Fifa, etc). I want a game, where you feel, that the team wanted to create something great, with passion. BF1 for example has its flaws, but the immersion was exceptional, something I will keep in good memories.
Where I would agree is to look at mechanics, what the players loved, the movement from BF5 for example, the fortification, the destruction and so on. But if for example there is an improvement for these systems possible, I am happy to see them.
