Does anyone know, from a purely cost POV, the difference between a MM system vs Persistent Servers? I understand that regional servers have been an issue for EA in previous BF games, so is this just a way to aggregate players and reduce costs?
The sooner DICE replace MM with a proper server browser / persistent server system the better judging by the number of players who currently can't even get into a match.
Endlessly hanging around in lobbies is no one's idea of fun.!
DICE please get rid of MM asap for the good of our sanity.
@Twordy wrote:
@Lancelot_du_LacI would be happy to play on the same server, with the same people, on the same map, and game mode 24/7 as it used to be.
Server Browser is a timeless must, especially to avoid brainless AI. The Lobby is a must for BR, HZ, or any small highly competitive, and player-ranked game.
Like you I would be VERY happy to play on the same server, with the same people, on the same map, and game mode 24/7 as it used to be.
DICE please give us back the Server Browser set up we used to enjoy. !!
