Forum Discussion
@GVlXxf "that why BF is a sucessful FPS game, as ppl can do anything they want before class system return. it is a bad return".
Huh, you just contradicted yourself. Before Specialists players could NOT do anything they wanted.
2042 was not successful which is why they returned to the new hybrid class system.
@Tank2042Man wrote:@GVlXxf"that why BF is a sucessful FPS game, as ppl can do anything they want before class system return. it is a bad return".
Huh, you just contradicted yourself. Before Specialists players could NOT do anything they wanted.
2042 was not successful which is why they returned to the new hybrid class system.
Judging by the Steam no., there were 3 times as many players playing the game with the introduction of a new map & new weapons in Season 3 rather than the last update with the "new class system".
That makes me believe the BF 2042 loyal fan base preffers new content (maps, weapons, QoL improvements) over bringing back outdated legacy features like class system.
- UP_Hawxxeye3 years agoLegend
@VME23 wrote:
@Tank2042Man wrote:@GVlXxf"that why BF is a sucessful FPS game, as ppl can do anything they want before class system return. it is a bad return".
Huh, you just contradicted yourself. Before Specialists players could NOT do anything they wanted.
2042 was not successful which is why they returned to the new hybrid class system.
Judging by the Steam no., there were 3 times as many players playing the game with the introduction of a new map & new weapons in Season 3 rather than the last update with the "new class system".
That makes me believe the BF 2042 loyal fan base preffers new content (maps, weapons, QoL improvements) over bringing back outdated legacy features like class system.Or perhaps you are comparing apples and oranges.
Content is what brings people but the "legacy features" are there to help them stay once they come.
Currently many people are probably done getting their battlepass to 100 and are taking a break until season 4
I would give it until season 4 comes for the effects of 3.2 to show
BF2042 is still on a journey to get where it should had launched at in terms of features and gamlpay
- HeroCllass3 years agoRising Vanguard
not in the video per se, but i have definitely seen your name around or similar
its a cool game handle
Battlefield would KICK THE CRAP out of COD or any other game and its hay day would not be in the past
If EA stopped making such bad decisions...
People would be throwing their money at EA, if only they listened to their customers, instead of their shareholders..
see my previous post for list of failures on EA's part....
@VME23
The maps are crap - they are hard to navigate, they are limited in scope and they do not match battlefield, they match cod
EA has said "oh it looks pretty and thats all what people want" and that is wrong - i have seen crap games with poor graphics
excel!
Its all about the GAME PLAY...good graphics are nice but they are not the core of the game......the core of the game IS THE GAME
also i wish EA would stop putting up crappy "fairy tale" single player mode, real battlefield players are multiplayers....
if you want single player games, go play cod...
@RaginSam
Bunch of rockets that do not do anything really..
@SCUBASTEVE120 - next post
im apart of the sub class of battlefield players that listen to "cotton eye joe" while playing, when im not team working that is =)in my opinion - bf2042 is absolutely beautiful for the eyes - but its broken - see list of broken or missing stuff on previous post (page 3 i think)
- UP_Hawxxeye3 years agoLegend
@HeroCllass
I do not even have to look into the list to agree.
The game was released too soon and with the wrong design goals. So all its lifetime is going to be a redemption arc in order to keep the franchise alive
BF4 was also similar in being released too soon, but it (mostly) had the correct base framework from release
- Psubond3 years agoLegend
@VME23 wrote:
@Tank2042Man wrote:@GVlXxf"that why BF is a sucessful FPS game, as ppl can do anything they want before class system return. it is a bad return".
Huh, you just contradicted yourself. Before Specialists players could NOT do anything they wanted.
2042 was not successful which is why they returned to the new hybrid class system.
Judging by the Steam no., there were 3 times as many players playing the game with the introduction of a new map & new weapons in Season 3 rather than the last update with the "new class system".
That makes me believe the BF 2042 loyal fan base preffers new content (maps, weapons, QoL improvements) over bringing back outdated legacy features like class system.some "legacy features" are not outdated. i'd rather be able to join a squad, leave a squad, play on my own, or kick a player from squad (you know, squad management) than this half measure class crap. same with persistent servers that had a real rotation and players stayed in the server until they CHOSE to leave. somehow those things are considered "legacy features"
- 3 years ago@VME23 The 30k peak was because of the free promotions. Had very little to do with the new map.
Season 1 and 2 release both peaked at around 16k.
Just watch the season 4 peak in 3 weeks time.- HeroCllass3 years agoRising Vanguard
@UP_Hawxxeye
the reason why bf4 had a good base framework, was because it was basically bf3 with new content and a new title name...SCUBASTEVE120
as a person who is a member of the pc master race, i must now look down upon you, as you are a self confessed xbox and ps member you are beneath my level as a gamer...lol
take off the training wheels and get a pc..
@Psubond
thats the word "manage" - "manage squad", "manage team", etc those features are missing from the game
@Psubond x 2
yes my wallet was reluctant to open this time, except that an old friend brought bf for himself and invited me, other then that i would not own the gameand i brought it on special for half price, even then the game did not work for over a year...
About Battlefield 2042 General Discussion
Recent Discussions
- 3 minutes ago
- 4 hours ago