Forum Discussion

2 years ago

New maps have gone from too large (in some people’s opinion) to too small

Can there not be a happy medium? You made the maps Call of Duty size. If I wanted that I would have bought Call of Duty. Can you please revert back or at least allow the choice of map sizes? I have g...

discussion

sk1lld

Legend

2 years ago

@zqww0i29scya

I feel that some of the maps were a bit too large, necessitating the dev's to take action. This was a large number of player's view also. I believe it made the game better not worse.

I'm not alone in my view.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/entertainment/gaming/what-players-need-to-know-before-giving-battlefield-2042-a-second-chance/ar-AA1hs40Y?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=03cea258b29d4b6580d482ad95ef46f9&ei=21

JOGAGATYA
Seasoned Ace
2 years ago
I agreed with OP. Redone maps are too small now.

I played BFV the other day on Al Sundan and Hamada. 64 players were plenty on those huge maps. (Larger than most BF2042 maps now)
BFV was the sweet spot in map sizes/player count.
- cso7777
  Seasoned Ace
  2 years ago
  @JOGAGATYA Most of the maps in BFV were smaller than Hamada and Al Sundan, their size were not the norm for BFV-maps.
  
  IMHO, the best maps in BFV were smaller maps (Arras, Devastation, OU etc).
  
  In general, BFV had a lot of CQC-fighting, of which there are pratically none in 2042.
  - JOGAGATYA
    Seasoned Ace
    2 years ago
    I actually loved ARRAS. Great map. About 4 times bigger than RECLAIMED.