Forum Discussion

Ai-Fluffy's avatar
Ai-Fluffy
Seasoned Ace
4 years ago

Noshahr Canals

Just played noshahr canals, a good little infantry map full of multiple tanks, two heli and a condor.

Does NO ONE at DICE play this game?

Seriously this is rediculous.

7 Replies

  • cso7777's avatar
    cso7777
    Seasoned Ace
    4 years ago

    Dice has totally lost any sense of balancing.

    All maps apparently has to have the same number of vehicles (in conquest), no matter how small the maps are.

    Most of the 64 player maps are not really suited to that many vehicles, especially with 'transport' vehicles being as strong as they are (the weapons).

    Vehicles in BF2042 are a big fail and I think they are a big part of the games problem with low player-count, overpowering vehicles have sucked much of the fun out of the game.

  • CloverDeuce's avatar
    CloverDeuce
    Seasoned Ace
    4 years ago

    CSO777: All maps apparently has to have the same number of vehicles (in conquest), no matter how small the maps are
    _________________________________________
    You answered your own question, Individual maps ARE NOT being looked at. Each game type is being coded for the same parameters, regardless of the map size or layout.

  • Would be a great map with a few BF3/BF4 light jeeps, quad runners, 1 LAV, and 1 Blackhawk. Flood Zone BF4 vibes as far as vehicle lineup. 

    It’s beyond comprehension why DICE ignores the features from previous BF games where each maps has unique vehicles. These tiny maps don’t need so many vehicles. Hind/Condor and the ridiculously OP stealth helos pretty much ruin any classic map where present. 

    If we had actual map rotations DICE could reuse portions of each 2042 with different vehicles line ups, that facilitate a theme per match. Some matches have lots of vehicles, somehave no vehicles except for quad runner, others have minimal vehicles. 

    As we all know from previous BF titles, it’s nice having a break from the same exact vehicle line up every single match. That vehicle variety set within a map rotation is one of the most iconic features of Battlefield for me at least.x Somehow the 2042 team didn’t get the memo. 

  • Do u really think that EA/Dice gives a rats a55 about this matter?, there about at least 200 ishues that they shove under the 

    carpet and dont care about, including urs... the worst is the "LACK OF SERVERBROWSER!"..... wich must be theit worst nightmare

    of any given time to exclude in their history..... nuf said!

    Ea must seriously consider the fact of terminate this crap called 2042 and focus on a new and BETTER! game without their BS talk about legacy blah, blah, blah,

  • RayD_O1's avatar
    RayD_O1
    Hero
    4 years ago

    @Zhukov211 wrote:

    Would be a great map with a few BF3/BF4 light jeeps, quad runners, 1 LAV, and 1 Blackhawk. Flood Zone BF4 vibes as far as vehicle lineup. 

    It’s beyond comprehension why DICE ignores the features from previous BF games where each maps has unique vehicles. These tiny maps don’t need so many vehicles. Hind/Condor and the ridiculously OP stealth helos pretty much ruin any classic map where present. 

    If we had actual map rotations DICE could reuse portions of each 2042 with different vehicles line ups, that facilitate a theme per match. Some matches have lots of vehicles, somehave no vehicles except for quad runner, others have minimal vehicles. 

    As we all know from previous BF titles, it’s nice having a break from the same exact vehicle line up every single match. That vehicle variety set within a map rotation is one of the most iconic features of Battlefield for me at least.x Somehow the 2042 team didn’t get the memo. 



    100% this, a bit of variety would be a massive improvement over what we currently have.

  • GrizzGolf's avatar
    GrizzGolf
    Seasoned Ace
    4 years ago

    I wish in 64 they would reduce the number a little 

About Battlefield 2042 General Discussion

Discuss the latest news and game information around Battlefield 2042 in the community forums.15,993 PostsLatest Activity: 14 minutes ago