@Anti-Tank-Killer Your name says it all! If you don't like vehicles go play team deathmatch on portal or make your own portal servers where there are no vehicles. Battlefield has always been about combined arms. And these changes go way too far to cater to infantry only players... Thats not what I bought the game for. I bought it for the grand all out warfare experience that we currently have in that mode. Yes the balance isn't perfect but less punishing changes can be made for the vehicles. Panzerstorm on BF5 had 7 tanks per team on 64 conquest and you are * telling me we are now only going to get 2 per team on 128 conquest with 2 minute cool down?! Yeah hell no!
More cover is being added which will help with the balance
Bolte/night bird should be put into their own categories and capped at 2 or 3 per team. That will greatly reduce the complaints from infantry
Some of these maps need more tanks than what we currently have. The biggest map in the game only has 3 tanks per team. That is extremely sad
The truth of the matter is if this change takes place, the vehicle oriented players will stop playing this game and thats a large amount of players. (Majority who enjoy combined arms). This aspect of battlefield is what attracts these people. And the people who already stopped playing aren't going to be coming back. So the player count is going to drop even further.
Battlefield with extremely limited vehicles in 128 player mode is like a PB&J sandwich with limited jelly...at first it sounds healthy, until you choke to death...
BF 2042 without vehicles is a generic version of COD.
And as I posted in another "Please don't kill BF by removing vehicles" thread:
Apex Olympus map has 11 Trident vehicle transports for 60 players, yet Battlefield 128 player modes will now have less vehicles than Apex 60 player mode?
Is this the final hint from EA that they want us all to transition from BF 2042 to Apex?
