Pc vs Console in FPS
I played FPS for over two decades on pc and console but never experienced such an unfair playing field as in bf2042. M&K the far superior input method for fps and it baffles me that console is not a...
Forum Discussion
@Getier 90% of the PC playerbase can barely run this game, and you're crying about m&k when you have base aimbot for controllers? Lol.
I don't know any PC players that have trouble running the game.... not sure where you got 90% from.
It's less taxing on the hardware than BFV is for me....although I can run both just fine.
- @Snakebite6x6x6 Sure. I can run BF5 on High graphics at around 80-100 fps, while 2042 barely reaching 70-80 on full LOW, and it's stuttering like crazy. Sometimes my VGA runs in 0%, while my processor is 100%. :D But, sure you can run it fine with the horrible mouse input.
- @Jozso987 Idk where pc players are getting this aimbot on console argument. Aim assist is completely broken and doesnt work
Pc is poor poor performance for me
And apparently console no ain't assist
And can't find a game for 5+ min with cross play off
Let's all agree this game is busted, after 100 hours IM really wishing I could atleast get reimbursed for testing the 2042 alpha beta
- @Snakebite6x6x6
Look at steam data survey and youll get it .. This game wont run at 60 fps unless someones as a minimum of a 6 core Ryzen CPU or a 6 to 8 core Recent Intel CPU first of all then the very minimum as to be above a 980 to a 1070 GPU to even remotly run this game around 60 FPS in 1080p so yeah the Hardware requirement dosnt suit most PC on steam wich is why many bought the game and refund it because they were running the game at sub 40 to 25 fps ... ill tell you the bare minimum requirement for 1080p 60 fps is a Ryzen 3600x and a GTX1070 lol and i am not kidding
