Forum Discussion
If the Devs are worried about filling servers then they really shouldn't have jumped on the 128 player band wagon. I know it makes good PR, but not if a few months in half the servers are 50% full of AI. They would have been better off maybe just increasing to 80 or 90, but then I guess people would complain it wasn't enough.
As an aside, how would people feel if the game merged servers to make 128 real players. Not saying that's logistically easy, but what about the principal of at the end of a round having say 3 not full servers merged into two full or near as, severs?
I’m perfectly fine with AI in Portal since that is more of a custom mode. What I don’t want is AI in the main modes like Conquest, Rush, etc.
I mean we’re getting a cross-platform game which means that PS players can play with Xbox and PC players… so DICE shouldn’t be worried about a lack of people in a server.
- 4 years ago
Giving the player base more options is allways a good thing for a game. We must have the option to tick a little box and show us servers with or without bots. This is a pretty big thing for myself as i have no urge what so ever to play vs AI and without that option i can honestly say i probably wont buy this game. just my opinion but this is a pretty big deal breaker for me i dont buy these games to play vs the computer i want the challenge of playing against people and all the random crap that comes with it.
- 4 years ago
Yes those are exactly my thoughts
- Jesse1654 years agoSeasoned Ace@DrunkwoIf and @thieves1988
I am pretty sure that will be one of the filter options in the Server Browser for Portal so you should be fine there.- 4 years ago@Jesse165 Yes but not in the base game a lot of people want to try out.
About Battlefield 2042 General Discussion
Recent Discussions
- 56 minutes ago
- 6 hours ago
- 8 hours ago