@Hezek1yah wrote:
"No, I am not. That's a great example of a strawman argument - you're putting words in my mouth. "
No it isn't. I said you wanted the ranger to stop shooting and be reduced to some kind of baggage handler instead. Jokingly I said "baggage" rather than "equipment" but the premise is the same. I then posted where you did in-fact state you wanted the change. You don't want the ranger "shooting" at you anymore and instead want him to be some kind of silly equipment mule.
You said what you said. Own it. The conversation between you and I is at an end.
I said what I said; your interpretation of it is clearly faulty and informed by your own inadequacies.
The only reason the conversation would be at an end is when you know that the position you are maintaining is insupportable. In other words, I accept that you have conceded that you are wrong.
The premise is clearly not the same - if it were, we wouldn't be having this conversation. My point regarding the Ranger was that drones in any form should not be in the game at all. If Rangers are to be kept in the game (I do not expect that they will be removed by the way, because players like you exist), my suggestion (you know - something constructive rather than endlessly moving goalposts in a vain effort to be right on the internet) was that it could be a resupply mule, following you around with hard-to-find ammo like underslung grenade rounds (currently, it is impossible to resupply these rounds; you have to die to get new ones).
I mean, if you don't have the skill to shoot people and consistently win (I classify this as having less than 10% accuracy on any primary weapon), then I guess drones and turrets make sense. What's your primary weapon accuracy?