@MZR_926 wrote:As long as Rao and FXM can significantly decrease the influence of helos without skills, most players don't practice AA and will continue to complain it's boring to use Rao and FXM. This is bad for both AA players and helo pilots.
What do you mean by the bolded statement?
Are you trying to say that if more players would practice Rao+FXM then they wouldn't find it boring? Is there some nuance to Rao+FXM that's discovered and appreciated after XX hours of practice?
I added Edit 3.
Edit 3:
I should have said this at first. I want AA players to use AA weapons that depend on skills.
Isn't FXM made for newbies?
@MZR_926 wrote:
@AngrySquid270I mean, they don't practice other AA weapons. There's no room becoming better at Rao+FXM. That is the problem.
just tell the truth, you want players to stop using lockons so you won't get shot down. hitting a nightbird or stealth that is maneuvering in anything other than a hover or a straight line with an M5 is dumb luck, it can't be done consistently and to say otherwise is dishonest. lock on missiles exist for a reason.
I added Edit 4.
Edit 4:
If more players use NTW or Recoilless against helos, helo pilots need to perform complex maneuvers, which make aiming difficult. Although Recoilless is difficult and too slow to hit helos consistently, it's better than FXM when you fight against decent or good pilots. (Infantry should not be able to kill good pilots easily.)
It's frustrating that my teammates don't deal any damage to an enemy helo when I dealt more than 50 damage to it with NTW or LATV4 50mm or something.
i'm going to keep using the FXM and Rao. they are the best counters to helos. the fact that it annoys helo pilots is a bonus to me and makes me smile.
implying that they require no skill and that their mechanics are an implication on my skill at the game will not work to get me to stop. when they take the stinger away from Rao i'll use the soflam and then anyone with a javelin or M5 will be able to lock on to the helo
