Re: Feature Request: Support AMD's FSR 2.0

AMD's RSR is nice but you can tell it lacks in quality.  Even AMD says it doesn't compare to FSR 1.0.   If all the hype is real, then FSR 2.0 is the real deal and hopefully it can be implemented.

In the meantime, I found a nice compromise.  Something I can't believe I didn't do earlier.  I upped my resolution to 3072x1728.  Squarely between 2k and 4k.  Image quality is really good but 2k the cost is comparable to 2k on my system.

Come on Dice.  Add FSR 2.0.

-SCADAGuy

What resolution is your monitor? 4K?

I also heard it would take DICE around 3 days to implement FSR 2.0 into Frostbite according to AMD's FSR 2.0 Game Developers Conference 2022 lecture.

FSR 2.0 is also compatible with consoles and would allow console players to have a higher quality upscaler than the one currently being used. I believe a lower quality checkerboard upscaler is currently being used in 2042.

Yeah, I have a 4k monitor.  Between 2k and 4k I have three additional resolutions.  The resolution I set the game to doesn't stretch everything out or squeeze anything, basically it maintains the correct the ratio in the screen.  It is higher than 2k so I get better image quality but low enough I stil get FPS between 80-120 FPS depending on the map with everything maxed out minus ray tracing.

You know, I think I read somewhere that if a game already had DLSS in it then it would take 2-3 days to add FSR 2.0, otherwise it would take 1-2 weeks.  I found that to be quite interesting.

Add FSR 2.0 Dice.  Please!

SCADAGuy

There’s not a cat in hells chance this will be included at any time!

These guys struggle to put a score board in the game so what chance has fsr 2.0 got?

@emerson1975I actually think that FSR 2.0 are probably simpler to implement than making a scoreboard. I don't know anything about coding 3D-graphics, but it is probably pretty easy to do as most of the work is done by AMDs drivers. AMD needs this to be easy to use, otherwise developers will not use it.

But you are right it will probably not be the first thing they do...

---

@SCADAguy wrote:

Yeah, I have a 4k monitor.  Between 2k and 4k I have three additional resolutions.  The resolution I set the game to doesn't stretch everything out or squeeze anything, basically it maintains the correct the ratio in the screen.  It is higher than 2k so I get better image quality but low enough I stil get FPS between 80-120 FPS depending on the map with everything maxed out minus ray tracing.

You know, I think I read somewhere that if a game already had DLSS in it then it would take 2-3 days to add FSR 2.0, otherwise it would take 1-2 weeks.  I found that to be quite interesting.

Add FSR 2.0 Dice.  Please!

SCADAGuy

---

What are you using to upscale 3072x1728 to 4K? The hardware upscaler in your monitor, the hardware upscaler in your GPU, or are you using Radeon Super Resolution software upscaler?

Unfortunately rsr does not work with battlefield 2042, instead we get a msg saying that FSR is supported, which means dice had fsr built into the engine this entire time and hasn't allowed us access to it because they were paid by nvidia to hold off.

We all know (devs included) that BF 2042 has big optimizations issues.

You MUST add FSR to BF 2042. It will drastically help players to have good performances.

But if DICE did, than they would proove that they care about Players and that would give them Kudos 

RSR does work and it will give you a notification that says Radeon Super Resolution ACTIVE or INACTIVE.....Depending on Resolution you choose 

Just to kick start this thread....

I am seeing the news regarding Season 2 starting up soon and a new work being done on the game.

https://youtu.be/bXwQknbg64A

What a fantastic time to add FSR 2.0 support!  Come on EA/Dice, you can do it!!!

- SCADAGuy