Re: Let people play with bots in Conquest mode without internet connection.

I would buy the gold edition again on PS4, but i refuse to pay for that PS plus crap ( it says that online play is required). I couldn't care less about MP... vs Ai is enough for me.

Please do not insult each other. Everyone’s opinion is welcome as long as it is respectful to others 🙂

Many of us agree that it would be great if offline mode is added at some point and more players will buy game in my opinion. But I also respect the opinion of others who think this is not feasible and I understand why they think so.

---

@ChrisAWJBethel wrote:
@Trokey66

From Wiktionary:
1. bigotry (Noun): Characteristic qualities of a bigot
2. bigot (Noun): One who is narrow-mindedly devoted to one's own ideas and groups, and intolerant of (people of) differing ideas.

---

Directly insulting people is against the Forum Rules. Consider this your one warning.

---

@ChrisAWJBethel wrote:
@Trokey66

From Wiktionary:
1. bigotry (Noun): Characteristic qualities of a bigot
2. bigot (Noun): One who is narrow-mindedly devoted to one's own ideas and groups, and intolerant of (people of) differing ideas.

---

Look at that definition.

Now considered your posts on this subject.

Now look at that definition again.....

You have narrow mindedly devoted yourself to the cause of an offline bot mode whilst dismissing off hand any and all possible reasons why such a mode has not been included, been dismissive of other views and intolerant of other people through the use of insults.

As I said, grow up. 

@Trokey66Because offline bots provide a way to play a game available to everyone, not just people with the 10000x Triple G Graphics Card and a 500 Gigabit Internet connection. I know this is very hard to understand, but there are poor people who play games who don't have access to an Internet connection or money for a monthly multiplayer subscription. Why don't you try putting yourself in their shoes?

@ChrisAWJBethel  it is not about 'being in their shoes'.

At what cost to EA/DICE, they are a business not a charity. Has it not occurred to you that even if technically possible, the cost/benefit may have been deemed unviable and a change at this stage may have undesirable impact on the project as a whole?

Hey folks,

I've been reading through this thread, and I just wanted to drop a friendly reminder to please stay civil with each other here on Answers HQ. Just because someone doesn't share your opinion doesn't mean you should attack them personally. Not everyone will agree with you, and that's OK. We want Answers HQ to be a place that's welcoming to everyone. 

I don't want to close this thread because we appreciate the feedback we've been seeing on this, but if we continue seeing personal attacks or other inappropriate comments we might have to lock it.

I'd encourage everyone to take a look at the Answers HQ Rules & Guidelines when you've got the chance to make sure you're not crossing any lines. 

Thanks, everyone!

Really can't believe this thread is still going! Its hilarious! You can "should'ves" all you like guys but it ain't going to happen. Dice have taken super leaps with their AI soldiers (not "bots" we have been politely informed). The remote processing required to achieve that must be horrendous, it cant all happen on a local machine i'm sure. These aren't going to be the bots from combined arms or the single player games etc, these are going to play with you, be part of your squads etc. They will be playing at your skill level, sometimes beyond. Whatever machine you have its never going to manage that on its own. "bots" dont exist any more.

---

@ChrisAWJBethel wrote:
@Trokey66Xbox made a controller specifically designed for people with disabilities. If Xbox can do that, DICE can implement offline bots into Battlefield.

---

I'm sure they could, but they are not gonna, and if you read the whole of this thread lots of people have explained why that might be so. We don't really care whether you want it or not, you are entitled to wish what you want, but we don't understand how you can believe that a company like EA is going to spend money to jump through hoops because you want something. Please don't let any of us put you off asking though... I'm dead curious to know how long you'll keep insisting..

---

@Trokey66 wrote:
@ChrisAWJBethelDoes that mean that Aston Martin, Rolls Royce and Jaguar should consider me when making cars or in reality do I accept that I can only afford my Seat?

Should Rolex or Cartier consider me when they make watches or should I just accept the fact that my Timex will suffice?

Should Gordan Ramsey look at his restaurant pricing for me or should I just settle for my Friday night Fish and Chips?

Businesses should cater to their customers as best they can but don't have to cater to everyone.

---