Forum Discussion

7 Replies

  • CantGetRight's avatar
    CantGetRight
    4 years ago

    I would like to see them add it to portal.  It was a favorite of mine from BF2 but I don't think it was well-received when BF3 came out as I hardly saw it in the rotation on servers.

  • Equilibrium_82's avatar
    Equilibrium_82
    New Veteran
    4 years ago

    more servers in battlefield2 was with only this map, in battlefield3 on frostbite2 looks better.

    in the times of battlefield2 no one cried like now people are complaining about everything.

    this series should stop at battlefield1. battlefield3 and battlefield bad company 2 should be remastered for all platforms.

  • Noodlesocks's avatar
    Noodlesocks
    4 years ago

    They should bring the 64 player version of the map to 2042 but also integrate Warlord into it for 128 players then they have two maps for the price of one for 64 players.

  • Lucas80's avatar
    Lucas80
    3 years ago

    BF3 got a half assed port of Strike at Karkand, it was the 32 player sized version from BF2, id love to see the proper BF2 64 player version for 2042 as its twice the size as the one we got in BF3

  • GrizzGolf's avatar
    GrizzGolf
    Seasoned Ace
    3 years ago

    @Lucas80 wrote:

    BF3 got a half assed port of Strike at Karkand, it was the 32 player sized version from BF2, id love to see the proper BF2 64 player version for 2042 as its twice the size as the one we got in BF3


    Me as well.

    I also had high hopes we might see 2142 and BF1 stuff added but portal just never took off. 

  • RayD_O1's avatar
    RayD_O1
    Hero
    3 years ago

    @GrizzGolf
    So much untapped potential, like you I had hoped to see loads more maps added which would have helped to keep the game fresh, a shame really. 😞

About Battlefield 2042 General Discussion

Discuss the latest news and game information around Battlefield 2042 in the community forums.16,136 PostsLatest Activity: 57 minutes ago