Remove the drone like you did with the shield
Just remove the from the game like you did the shield until you fix the ability to put C5 on it. It's not a "fun battlefield mechanic" it's an exploit and a bug and will only get worse as it gets m...
Forum Discussion
@GosBiker wrote:So, exploit has became fun and creativity? Great.
Yes, you better believe that they can be fun
I draw the line based on if the scale of such a practice is big enough to really become a dominant way of playing. So far DICE had not even found it statistically significant enough to make a comment about it, unlike the SOFLAM M5 ignoring the flares issue.
I am optimistic that the next patch will make it a lot harder for anyone to c5 a tank with a drone.
If not, it will get the BF3 MAV treatment.
I hope that it will happen - that the next patch will not allow this C5 + drone , or at least as most people have suggested, allow just 1 C5 on it. Though I still feel its not fair, but knowing that the tanks won't die, you'll have lesser people doing this ..
And finally people will do what it takes to get rid of a tank that is causing massive damage, properly.
I play both vehicles and infantry and I would love a fair balance between both.
@GosBikerthen you should be more concerned about how the turret turn speed and low angles are really disadvantageous for the tanks.
As a tanker, the ease of the M5 launcher has frustrated me a lot more than other sources of tank death.There was that one time there the defending side in BR Manifest had a squad that was more organized that usual and was firing M5s at every tank of the attacking team and a really disturbing frequency. The attackers were constantly with destroyed or hiding tanks.
I find that the ratio of vehicles and infantry is really biased in favor of the infantry.
The drones with the C5s are merely a trifle compared to the more accessible slaughter with the M5s
