Forum Discussion
Enough pitchforks always works
But imo the whole underbarrel being basically available on almost all weapons was a mistake anyway so is the implementation of the plus system. Especially considering you can throw like 3 types of underbarrels onto your weapon which is dumb as hell, the plus system isn't very well thought out to begin with with the ammo types plus the underbarrel issue. While the SCAR has a underbarrel as default it all makes zero sense.
I never got used to using them I find it very finicky for my playstyle and often the game gets stuck in the wrong mode and I cannot fire my weapon doesn't swap properly. So yeah never touched these things myself.
Think they should simply allow just 1 singular underbarrel in the plus system at a time if they up the ammo count again.
Nah I like the plus menu and it works for modern times of BF, same goes for regular weapon ammo that you have different mags of too.
However I may have thought of another possible solution for the 40mm here now -
-> SHARED AMMO POOL!
Examples if you equip all types:
- Previously you had 3 of each for a total of 9.
- Currently you have 1 of each for a total of 3.
- New suggestion: shared ammo pool of maximum 5 total.
That means if you fire 3 HE, you have only 2 smokes or 2 incendiary left or vice versa.
THAT sounds like a good compromise and good balance, right? Its also similar to previous BF games ie. BC2 had 4 in ammo, BF2 (2005) had 5.
I even recall that 2042 maybe had this shared ammo at launch but that they changed it in a patch, if so very weird..
- doubleome2 years agoSeasoned Ace
@JWGrasliPlus system just adds to the problems 2042 has, just another thing adding to the chaos and unpredictability. Finding a stable setup especially with how accurate weapons are there is no real need imo to change often. Silencers and ammo types sure, but not everything, weirdly enough you don’t even have an animation to change stuff apart from ammo it’s just instant, that’s not good for a Battlefield game. What’s even the point of the double zoom scopes? Introduced in FPS games just before 2042 came out, 2042 implemented them and also instantly made them kinda irrelevant. Oh wait I know why added them to the game they look great in gameplay trailers, adds depth to the battle.
The strength of a well balanced Battlefield game is never being fully prepared for the situation you are faced with, but that was almost 100% undone when 2042 came out. Hence why the plus system is one of the issues.I like the idea of the system but it needs a massive overhaul if it returns in a new title, with the focus on making it not as casual to change stuff as it is now.
- 2 years ago@doubleome Everyone has access to the Plus system. There is no balance issue or any issues with the Plus system. It's a very good addition to the game and significantly increases the amount of tactics available to everyone. If someone chooses to use up all their Plus slots for UBGLs then it's their choice, they lose access to grips or lasers for that. Nothing in the Plus system changes a gun enough to allow it to function outside of its niche besides maybe the BSV-M.
rest of the irrelevant stuff: Battlefield isn't a milsim game, it's never been realistic. 1942 had jetpacks in it. The animations instantly switching stuff is perfectly "good" for a Battlefield game. Double zoom scopes? Variable zoom? That's been in the games since at least BF2. Or you mean canted iron sights? No idea what you're referring to with "double zoom".- doubleome2 years agoSeasoned Ace
Canted sights ind
Rest wasn’t about realism or milsim.
About Battlefield 2042 General Discussion
Recent Discussions
- 4 hours ago
- 23 hours ago
- 2 days ago
- 3 days ago