Snap Tracking at it's Best!

---

@SVND0WN wrote:

@AdamonicThe aim-assist does not snap to heads. It only snaps to bodies, which is one of the downsides of using it. The single and only major benefit from aim-assist is getting to snap to someone's body, so it basically only benefits extremely low TTK weapons, like shotguns which are instant or DMRs. And that's why you are suddenly seeing a ton of people using the M39 EMR.

That data is meaningless. Assuming aim-assist even factored into headshots, it would still be meaningless because you didn't provide a total number of kills. And even with a total number of kills, it would, yet again, still be meaningless. Skilled players should have around a ~25-30% HS rate TOTAL, as in, of every single kill they have ever gotten with all weapons. In a single match? That could be 50-60% HS kill rate, if they didn't get a ton of kills. The more kills they have in a match, the lower that number will go, so I would be willing to bet that PC player killed significantly more than the console player. I also bet I've had some matches with ~90% headshot kill rates when I've been sniping, honestly. And that still means absolutely nothing. Hell, I have a 30% HS kill rate with the AK24 over 500 kills and a 76.5% HS kill rate with the DXR over 100 kills on PC. Compared to such a tiny sample size as in a single match, 21% isn't even that high of a HS rate when many people can have well over that amount for their entire lifetime stats.

Plus, how do you even know it was a console player? If they had the Xbox icon, it could have been someone playing through GamePass on PC.

---

Snap to body + recoil of any weapon = HS. Also, the accuracy rates are similar in that the tracking of moving targets is very similar.

I was comparing known PC players and known console players that I have actually played with. All whom are really good in their own right. What I noticed was the console player had similar kills and KD but when it came to accuracy and HS%, he was higher than PC players and higher than literally the best PC players. There are obviously a lot of factors that go into those stats, preferred weapons, etc, but when I compared like weapons, the majority of the time, the console player had better stats across the board than the PC player. Not all the weapons, but majority of them. 

If aim assist is supposed to level the playing field, it should not make console players' aiming stats (accuracy and HS%) better than a comparable PC player, and definitely not make them better than the best PC player on the planet. I am an above-average player, have been playing FPS for a long time, have a 2.0 KD and top 1% PTFOing, yet I would be beaten 1v1 by at least 75% of console players when we are shooting at each other with the same weapon from the same distance solely due to aim assist.