Forum Discussion

slizzard's avatar
slizzard
4 years ago

sniper rifle killing a tank????

This has gotten dumb time to get rid of snipers allready. 
discussion
DrimacusEUROCOR's avatar
DrimacusEUROCOR
4 years ago
@slizzard get rid of snipers? what do you want next? get rid of armor piercing ammo and or vehicles to destroy tanks? get a grip
  • slizzard's avatar
    slizzard
    4 years ago
    @DrimacusEUROCORP try shooting a m1 with a 50 and see what happens? its not going to do *. that gun is way over powered.
    • Psubond's avatar
      Psubond
      Legend
      4 years ago
      @slizzard then by your logic AGMs should OHK a tank...if we're doing it by what would happen in real life that is.
    • DrimacusEUROCOR's avatar
      DrimacusEUROCOR
      4 years ago

      anti material rifles exists for a reason

      one of them is to disable a tank by shooting weak parts of it, i.e. less armored parts, tracks, rear...

      • slizzard's avatar
        slizzard
        4 years ago
        @DrimacusEUROCORP no AMR's should not kill a MBT. lightly armored tanks and other vehicles yep np
    • edgecrusherO0's avatar
      edgecrusherO0
      Seasoned Ace
      4 years ago
      @slizzard I mean, this ain't a milsim so no.

      I swear vehicle drivers just want to play a game where they roll around like gods and can't be touched by infantry.
      • Ironhead841's avatar
        Ironhead841
        Hero
        4 years ago

        While I don't think we should get rid of snipers as the OP suggested I do think it's dumb that the .50 can kill an armored tank. Disable a track maybe, but not blow it to bits.

        @slizzard is this like your first Battlefield?

        Because snipers have pretty much been annoying little turds since the original BF so I don't think they are going anywhere, lol.

Featured Places

Recent Discussions