sniper rifle killing a tank????
This has gotten dumb time to get rid of snipers allready.
Forum Discussion
@slizzard get rid of snipers? what do you want next? get rid of armor piercing ammo and or vehicles to destroy tanks? get a grip
@DrimacusEUROCORP try shooting a m1 with a 50 and see what happens? its not going to do *. that gun is way over powered.
anti material rifles exists for a reason
one of them is to disable a tank by shooting weak parts of it, i.e. less armored parts, tracks, rear...
- @DrimacusEUROCORP no AMR's should not kill a MBT. lightly armored tanks and other vehicles yep np
- @slizzard I mean, this ain't a milsim so no.
I swear vehicle drivers just want to play a game where they roll around like gods and can't be touched by infantry.While I don't think we should get rid of snipers as the OP suggested I do think it's dumb that the .50 can kill an armored tank. Disable a track maybe, but not blow it to bits.
@slizzard is this like your first Battlefield?
Because snipers have pretty much been annoying little turds since the original BF so I don't think they are going anywhere, lol.
Antitank weapons in BF games are generally pretty weak, having a sniper rifle with even less damage than rocket launchers, is not really an issue (balance-wise).
You can argue that these 'special' weapons often some distract people from PTFOing and that is perhaps the biggest issue, they are too specific / limited in use.
no mostly i like ground combat im only using a tank to get a weapon unlocked for it. its just really annoying. snipers have gotten so much worse these past few months.
