@ChugKendall wrote:Personally, I couldn't care less about the huge maps with the jets and tanks; I would much rather engage in close quarters combat.
It kind of sounds like Battlefield isn't the game for you. Those are all big pillars of what make Battlefield.. Battlefield. Usually there's 1 or 2 maps that are pretty CQB but the majority are what you don't want.
It will be interesting to see how the new maps are set up with the 'clusters' of control points - makes me think that they will cater to both play styles. Some clusters will provide for CQB while the no mans land in between will be more for vehicle and long distance combat. If I were you I would pay attention to that info in the coming months.
@ChugKendall wrote:
And to add to the sniper discussion, there is no way for someone to quick-scope a sniper rifle in real life, period, so if we're going for realism then that shouldn't be a part of it all. Just my 2 cents.
These games were never about realism. Sure there are elements of it but if it were completely realistic it wouldn't appeal to the masses because the systems would be too 'slow'. If it was a milsim do you really think they would have added a rendezook to the trailer?
I've played many versions of BF over the years. Thanks, but I'll be fine. Also, I do enjoy CoD's small maps, for example, but there's too much quick-scope sniper nonsense on there, now, so I hope BF will be a nice change of pace.
@DingoKillrI fail to see how my last date of sniper rifle activity has anything to do with not being able to run around a field with one, quick-scoping people, like the shenanigans in CoD. Do you have some information to refute my statement?
@DingoKillr I understand, but I think we were talking about two different things. There were comments about small maps, and also about how quick-scoping has ruined CoD. I was just combining the two issues for a post.
