so DICE/EA will this game be abandoned ?
just like you pulled the plug on BFV? just curious what the long term goal is since it is bsaically a step by step repeat of BFV.....
Forum Discussion
@VOLBANKER_PC Lol wtf do you want from a map if you thought the BFV maps were bad?
Bfv launch maps were sick, you probably have a gaming chair from the 90s too
Bfv launch maps were sick, you probably have a gaming chair from the 90s too
@Flavin913 Fjell and its plane domination wants to have a talk with you.
IMO, only Arras and Devastation provided great experiences for infantry, others were dominated by vehicles and/or snipers with long sightlines and great vantage points.
IMO, only Arras and Devastation provided great experiences for infantry, others were dominated by vehicles and/or snipers with long sightlines and great vantage points.
@UP_SunnyTheWolf wrote:
@Flavin913Fjell and its plane domination wants to have a talk with you.
IMO, only Arras and Devastation provided great experiences for infantry, others were dominated by vehicles and/or snipers with long sightlines and great vantage points.And there is the problem.
Pretty much every BFV map had flags or areas that were advantageous to either tanks or infantry or were fairly neutral yet you and most of the people complaining about 2042 think the best maps are the ones where infantry have full cover on pretty much the whole playing area which Rotterdam and Devastation come close to doing so.
That's why you players have such a hard time playing 2042 maps even though yet again we have flags that are better or worse for vehicles or infantry.
You seem to want maps with complete cover between every single flag and not have to deal with any vehicles.
@Tank2042Man
You seem to want maps with complete cover between every single flag and not have to deal with any vehicles.
—————————————————————-
BF was more or less build as a vehicle game on large open maps.
Now we have large open maps again, but It could look like that Old BF players do not want specialists and new players do not want large open maps. Difficult situation for Dice.
@SirBobdk wrote:@Tank2042Man
You seem to want maps with complete cover between every single flag and not have to deal with any vehicles.
—————————————————————-
BF was more or less build as a vehicle game on large open maps.
Now we have large open maps again, but It could look like that Old BF players do not want specialists and new players do not want large open maps. Difficult situation for Dice.Good point.
We have a whole swathe of players who think battlefield is OP Metro and vehicles should be killed with just one click of a button.
Specialists or all class weapons and gadgets is different but from my POV it's just classes with an additional layer on top.
Would I prefer traditional classes? Probably but its not a deal breaker for me. Still plays like a battlefield game, just one that's got a more futuristic tone.
Featured Places
