Sorry, but what the hell are you doing DICE?
First of all, why did you make a survey when you don't listen anyways? Litterally EVERYONE wants the specialists in a different way, but you refuse to do anything because of money. Letting players c...
Forum Discussion
@ragnarok013Bfv failed beacuse they listened to the very same ppl that are bashing 2042, including yourself. I rememeber some of your comments aswell. Seems like dice knows this too, as they were pretty selective with those surveys.
@GLOCK_IN_DA_SOCK wrote:
@ragnarok013Bfv failed beacuse they listened to the very same ppl that are bashing 2042, including yourself. I rememeber some of your comments aswell. Seems like dice knows this too, as they were pretty selective with those surveys.
@GLOCK_IN_DA_SOCK It's not hard to remember some of my comments as I left 8 pages, single spaced of them in the Beta feedback section and it was one of the highest upvoted threads in the Beta forum. I understand what the Community generally likes after so many years moderating the Battlefield forums and hosting FridayNightBattlfield and I was one of the harshest critics of BF5 when I participated in the Alpha. Many like myself are also leveling the same criticism on 2042 so no we are not the same people DICE listened to in BF5; DICE is listening to the same people in 2042 as they did in BF5.
@ragnarok013I remember quite well your post, and the comments under it. (That's what I was referring too) they literally took several of your suggestions(I'm sure they were from several sources but were included in your feedback) and copy pasted them into the game in late Nov early Dec, then you turned around and panned them for doing so. This is what I'm talking about. It's dammed if you do and dammed if you dont. That's why portal is a thing. So the negative nacys can make bf their own way. I'll see you on 2042, cuz we all know yall are gunna end up buying it anyways. Then in a couple of years you can come on here and state your disdain for the new title, and how it's not like 2042 like you've done for every title since bf4.
@GLOCK_IN_DA_SOCK wrote:
@ragnarok013I remember quite well your post, and the comments under it. (That's what I was referring too) they literally took several of your suggestions(I'm sure they were from several sources but were included in your feedback) and copy pasted them into the game in late Nov early Dec, then you turned around and panned them for doing so. This is what I'm talking about. It's dammed if you do and dammed if you dont. That's why portal is a thing. So the negative nacys can make bf their own way. I'll see you on 2042, cuz we all know yall are gunna end up buying it anyways. Then in a couple of years you can come on here and state your disdain for the new title, and how it's not like 2042 like you've done for every title since bf4.
@GLOCK_IN_DA_SOCK my 8 page feedback was reference 2042's beta. I've never condemned DICE for bringing in anything I've suggested in BF5. The main feedback that they incorporated into BF5 that I praised them for - not condemned, was ammo/medic crate AOE, a more authentic look for 5.0, and authentic cosmetics late in the game. I repeatedly condemned them for the multiple TTK changes because BF5 TTK was one of the few highly praised things in BF5 yet they kept forcing them on an unwanting player base. I condemned DICE most vociferously for 5.2 and, while I was happy they walked 5.2 back, they still didn't completely revert their 5.2 with their walk back which I raised as a big issue for obvious reasons since it didn't need to be changed due to the player base like 5.0's TTK almost universally with only a few "negative Nancies" as you say. I'm curious as to what feedback apart from the 5.2 stuff I just mentioned you think I condemned them for incorporating that I suggested since you seem to have read my posts with great interest back then.
Regarding your snark about my future disdain for new titles I didn't like Battlefield 1 or V so I'm definitely not lamenting that 2042 is not like BF1 or BF5 - in fact I'm quite happy that 2042 is some ways is much closer to BF4 than the last two (which is why in my feedback the first thing I said was I enjoyed the beta) and nothing like BF1/5 in many more ways. My main issue with 2042 is Specialists and no weapon restrictions, with an additional albeit very small objection to the movement and gun play. Live Service is also a bane to modern gaming but one we're not likely to see the end of until something much more sinister develops gaming - you gotta know which hills to die on so I don't beat that drum.
I didn’t know those things about BF1, thanks for posting it everyone.
Strange BF1 had player retention problems imo.
I love that game 🙂
Ok, back to BF2042…….
