Squad diserter implementation
I have seen a few posts about the lack of gameplay with randoms in squads. With such large maps, I wonder how simple/hard it would be to incorporate a distance-based alert that gives the squad leade...
Forum Discussion
@R00zilla This is a terrible idea. Why should i be stuck playing in a way that someone else insists i play? You think just because a random person gets assigned squad leader that they will do anything useful/competent. One player will dictate the experience for three others. No thanks
@Psubond So you would prefer to play lone-wolf in a squad/team game, interesting.
What if there was an option at the start of the round to join as a lone wolf or go into a squad? That would at least offer others knowledge of each player's intentions and let the squads fill out with ppl that are willing to work together.
What if there was an option at the start of the round to join as a lone wolf or go into a squad? That would at least offer others knowledge of each player's intentions and let the squads fill out with ppl that are willing to work together.
@R00zilla wrote:
@PsubondSo you would prefer to play lone-wolf in a squad/team game, interesting.
What if there was an option at the start of the round to join as a lone wolf or go into a squad? That would at least offer others knowledge of each player's intentions and let the squads fill out with ppl that are willing to work together.No, i dont want some rando with a god complex messing with me
@Psubond wrote:
@R00zilla wrote:
@PsubondSo you would prefer to play lone-wolf in a squad/team game, interesting.
What if there was an option at the start of the round to join as a lone wolf or go into a squad? That would at least offer others knowledge of each player's intentions and let the squads fill out with ppl that are willing to work together.No, i dont want some rando with a god complex messing with me
This reply makes no sense.You want to go lone wolf...but don't want the option to go lone wolf and not mess with ppl that want to play in squads. Laughable and not helpful in any way.
Let's break this down and go really slow for you... if there were options before the round and in the round pause menu to leave the squad....could this work?
If not, why?
Is there something that could help fix this?
How could that be addressed?
@droozilla a "team game" does not enforce gameplay by dictat, it enforces gameplay by guidance. It encourages working together but never enforces it unless its a very specific kind of game.
I.e you have objectives, you have ways to reach them, you have a massive map and you have over 50 people per team. Should all people approach the objective from the same direction and in the same attack method at all times? and are all those who do something different but still PTFO deserters?
Do not constrain a military inspired game to a tactical military regime. This is battlefield not ARMA.
All the "In battlefield only" moments we've had for years? Yeah those come from playing outside of the box, not in it.@xeNizKingAwesome slur...very imaginative.
Again, why do ppl not read the thread?... This would be a simple option allowing the breakup of ppl that want to play together. It wouldn't affect the squad that wants to work together in the slightest. No one ever said what the restrictions would be or not....it was merely a conversation starter. You obviously don't understand what the premise is as you have not addressed anything stated but rather added some nonsense about everyone doing the same thing.This whole thread started as a way to allow small groups or solo players the freedom to approach the game either together or alone.....in their own way. You reinforce exactly what I said but construed it incorrectly.
Thank you for your input but it is clearly rhetorical.
Featured Places
