@CPT_GASLIGHT wrote:
@madinogi wrote:I do not give a single Poop about what works or is or not used in the real world, i care about Game Balance.
and for that ECM and Flare shoudl have completely different use cases in game. END OF.
want realism and accuracy. best to go play some simulator like Arma.
It’s not balanced getting locked on from every direction and being unable to evade them because you decided to fly near an objective either.
What a rediculous statement!
It’s not balanced getting shot at from every direction and being unable to evade them because you decided to run near an objective either.
Look at it from an infantry point of view and you'll see why.
If multiple players need to do the same thing to dispatch a target, that is not unbalanced, it's called teamwork.
That multiple can be +20. Means army of AA can run around. I think measures are given against every lockon that can be in game, means in worst case scenario. Just to be clear, if these measures would be nerfed, should aircrafts weapons get buff? Since if one can't even enter the field lets say at all? Just for a second, let's think about firepower vs a guy wants destroyer vehicular kill. At that point we would be in milsim.
@Man_iLoveFishing wrote:That multiple can be +20. Means army of AA can run around. I think measures are given against every lockon that can be in game, means in worst case scenario. Just to be clear, if these measures would be nerfed, should aircrafts weapons get buff? Since if one can't even enter the field lets say at all? Just for a second, let's think about firepower vs a guy wants destroyer vehicular kill. At that point we would be in milsim.
if we went milsim then helos would not go anywhere near the battle in this game due to MANPADs and small arms fire. they would not survive because at the ranges used in this game even to edge of OOB for aircraft there would be no lockon warning and the missile would destroy the helo before the pilot had a chance to do anything assuming he saw smoke in the air.
@Psubond wrote:
@Man_iLoveFishing wrote:That multiple can be +20. Means army of AA can run around. I think measures are given against every lockon that can be in game, means in worst case scenario. Just to be clear, if these measures would be nerfed, should aircrafts weapons get buff? Since if one can't even enter the field lets say at all? Just for a second, let's think about firepower vs a guy wants destroyer vehicular kill. At that point we would be in milsim.
if we went milsim then helos would not go anywhere near the battle in this game due to MANPADs and small arms fire. they would not survive because at the ranges used in this game even to edge of OOB for aircraft there would be no lockon warning and the missile would destroy the helo before the pilot had a chance to do anything assuming he saw smoke in the air.
If this was a milsim we’d have a drone scouting an area or a target area that is laser designated and the helicopters can kill you before you even knew it.
@CPT_GASLIGHT wrote:
@Psubond wrote:
@Man_iLoveFishing wrote:That multiple can be +20. Means army of AA can run around. I think measures are given against every lockon that can be in game, means in worst case scenario. Just to be clear, if these measures would be nerfed, should aircrafts weapons get buff? Since if one can't even enter the field lets say at all? Just for a second, let's think about firepower vs a guy wants destroyer vehicular kill. At that point we would be in milsim.
if we went milsim then helos would not go anywhere near the battle in this game due to MANPADs and small arms fire. they would not survive because at the ranges used in this game even to edge of OOB for aircraft there would be no lockon warning and the missile would destroy the helo before the pilot had a chance to do anything assuming he saw smoke in the air.
If this was a milsim we’d have a drone scouting an area or a target area that is laser designated and the helicopters can kill you before you even knew it.
drone would get stinger treatment too
