Forum Discussion
@Airstriker973-4 jets per match?! Lol don't be silly, no need for 3-4 jets spawn-camping vehicles every match.
2-3 attack air vehicles?! Lol don't be silly, that was already the game the past several months - DICE reducing attack air vehicles to 1 per team is an unexpected surprise to be sure, but a welcome and balanced one. Scrubby air spam is by far the worst thing in the game.
Next step is to further balance Condor / Hind.
- 4 years ago
@UNL1M1T3D_P0W3RI can tell you’ve never played a battlefield game before this one. Go back to cod with your braindead comment
- Airstriker974 years agoRising Hotshot
You read my mind lol
- Airstriker974 years agoRising Hotshot@Assault You read my mind lol
- 4 years ago@Assault I play in Aus servers too (my username ain't the same as this) and know first-hand you're one of those terrible, terrible players that only abuses Nightbird lol. And I've played several previous Battlefield titles; this game is a walk in the park. I don't blame you for being upset though, looks like you're going to have to play Solo for your bird experience lol #DontBeSad #ThisIsJustHowItWorksOutSometimes
- 4 years ago
@UNL1M1T3D_P0W3R wrote:
@AssaultI play in Aus servers too (my username ain't the same as this) and know first-hand you're one of those terrible, terrible players that only abuses Nightbird lol. And I've played several previous Battlefield titles; this game is a walk in the park. I don't blame you for being upset though, looks like you're going to have to play Solo for your bird experience lol #DontBeSad #ThisIsJustHowItWorksOutSometimes@UNL1M1T3D_P0W3R Your username is live on battletracker and based on that looks like yet another person with no ability to fly whining about people who can. I've been farming people like you since day 1. It's not our fault you're bad at the game
- Airstriker974 years agoRising Hotshot@UNL1M1T3D_P0W3R Air spam has never been a issue. Even on the most air asset heavy maps in Battlefield 4. AA tanks easily kill 99% of pilots and for a 32 man team. Most you got was 1 fighter, 1 attack, Transport, 2 vipers. Unless you played air superiority which is all air assets only. Fighters barely attack helictopers as it is in 2042. Jets also cant spawn camp when spawns are huge and easy to counter as well
- 4 years ago@Airstriker97 Your first comment just proves how biased and delusional you are towards scrubby air spam, which absolutely has been an issue in this game. Devs should absolutely create an air-vehicle mode, but they've made the right choice with 1 attack air vehicles per team (especially with stealth helis coming to the game lol).
- UP_Hawxxeye4 years agoLegend
I have mixed feelings about jets
I want them to get more love.
But I also do not want a situation where every other vehicle is ceaselessly swarmed by jets. I will never forget how that feels in previous titles. For starters, any love any aircraft gets needs to be counterbalanced by effective means of countering it.
Even in their current sorry state, the jets are unlikely to take lethal damage from anything on the ground.
- 4 years ago
@UNL1M1T3D_P0W3R wrote:@Airstriker973-4 jets per match?! Lol don't be silly, no need for 3-4 jets spawn-camping vehicles every match.
2-3 attack air vehicles?! Lol don't be silly, that was already the game the past several months - DICE reducing attack air vehicles to 1 per team is an unexpected surprise to be sure, but a welcome and balanced one. Scrubby air spam is by far the worst thing in the game.
Next step is to further balance Condor / Hind.I do think Airstriker wants too many air vehicles, but he is correct in saying that the reduction to 1 per team is ridiculous. You're wrong in the sense that real vehicle balance in Battlefield never involved reduction, it was about making the vehicles themselves balanced. This is because giving each team only 1 attack asset (and especially combining so many vehicles in that category) reduces the role of air in a match, whereas air is supposed to play a major factor in who wins, just like land (or sea depending on the game/map). Point is, DICE recategorizing and reducing air vehicles was a lazy way to avoid balancing the actual issues with said vehicles. Said reduction has made air assets almost completely ineffective when it comes to swaying a match, which is disgraceful when compared to other titles in the franchise.
- 3 years ago
Maybe you should stop talking silly, it's a Battlefield game not CoD, they can buff players for having more rocket launchers and better opportunities to take out air and ground vehicles, but reducing the numbers make it more like an infantry fighting game CoD style, if that is what you like there are lots of CoD titles already.
About Battlefield 2042 General Discussion
Recent Discussions
- 29 minutes ago