@twistedantitank [Edited*]
Weapon freedom makes for more diverse gunplay. Restrict everyone to one category per class and you'll just start making threads about how one AR or one SMG is all you see people using and needs a nerf.
(*Edited post to clean things up to align with rules. CM)
@Anarchiesx wrote:
@twistedantitankScrew that. Dumb idea.
Weapon freedom makes for more diverse gunplay. Restrict everyone to one category per class and you'll just start making threads about how one AR or one SMG is all you see people using and needs a nerf.
why was it ok to do it to gadgets then?
@Prof3ss0r_M1k3 wrote:
@Anarchiesx wrote:
@twistedantitankScrew that. Dumb idea.
Weapon freedom makes for more diverse gunplay. Restrict everyone to one category per class and you'll just start making threads about how one AR or one SMG is all you see people using and needs a nerf.why was it ok to do it to gadgets then?
Never said it was OK, as I enjoyed the total freedom this game initially was. But now we have the class/gadget restrictions and it is what it is. Why are you just deflecting to something else?
And gadgets are very distinct from firearms in significant ways, so why are you conflating the two categories? If they were going to implement any restrictions via "class" system, the gadgets were the way to do it. But by all means, if complaining about the game we have is all that interests you then post away.
The initial problem with 2042 was that it was released with no class system. That was a huge mistake as predicted. No wonder players were calling this game,"Diarrhea in the toilet."
Previous Battlefield and FPS games like BF1 and Killzone 2 had a class-based system. The class-based system is a core mechanic that is at the heart of a good FPS game. Battlefield 1, Battlefield 4, and Killzone 2's class system are excellent examples. None of them limited diversity and there were plenty of weapons to choose from for each class. If you want to use a weapon from another class, just make it pick up dropped weapons like in Killzone 2. You could see the weapon flashing and pick it up.
Now EA used a band aid approach to 2042 by adding classes after realizing their mistake, except players can just choose any weapon they want. So what do players do? They'll choose Falck with syringe and ammo pack or Mackay with a sniper rifle and med pens, or another class with any weapon. Weapons need to be limited for specific classes to clearly define their roles i.e. assault should have assault rifles, medics smgs, snipers marksman and sniper rifles and engineers lmgs. Never saw too many of any class in BF 1 or BF 4, so that's not an issue.
Currently, there's no class balance which destroys the quality of the game. 99% of FPS players want game balance not diversity. I'd rather be limited to 5 weapons on a class rather than having snipers run amok with sub-machine guns killing you from 80m away and vice versa.
I think the fact we have specialists makes the weapon restrictions difficult if not impossible to balance properly. I think this is the classical "painted yourself into a corner".
