Really? Haven't you guys noticed when it uses 40mm, it flies low asf. Now since Liz is buffed, still not enough. This forum is trying to get to the point where infantry wants to be untouchable. No support at all, time to find work around.
Cause if they nerf that to the ground, next step is when mg is op and after mg nerf, there are too many mgs. Just speculation, but feels like that.
@Man_iLoveFishing wrote:Really? Haven't you guys noticed when it uses 40mm, it flies low asf. Now since Liz is buffed, still not enough. This forum is trying to get to the point where infantry wants to be untouchable. No support at all, time to find work around.
Cause if they nerf that to the ground, next step is when mg is op and after mg nerf, there are too many mgs. Just speculation, but feels like that.
It's a skill issue if you're getting farmed by a Hind with a 40mm grenade launcher. As you said, the pilot has to fly super low and expose themselves to all sorts of dangers. By running the 40mm grenade launcher instead of the 50mm canon, you're giving up the ability to take out the defenders ground vehicles. So that means a well placed jeep with the 50mm canon and other folks playing engineer working together should be able to take it out if the pilot decides to overexpose.
A good MAV is far more deadly than a Hind with a 40mm grenade launcher.
I just think this is better for balancing reasons because of the new class update. Less launchers means that vehicles should be adjusted to make it balanced
@ZRuff46Good point bringing that up. In BF4 when DICE introduced below radar, they made AA missiles much more lethal (do more damage with more range I believE) at the same time.
In BF2042, when DICE introduced below radar, they did nothing to the AA missiles in general except a slight buff to their physics and speed (barely noticable). DICE did not balance the helis at all in the recent patch, it was a defacto buff to them. Which I find incredibly odd.
