4 years ago
The case FOR specialists
Embrace change! I know this is an unpopular opinion but please try to read this with an open mind. When has this franchise not been about change? Every iteration has had a new system or mechanic. B...
@BaronVonGoonAt least to me, the specialists fix a major class balance problem that was especially prevalent in BF1 and BFV with some classes being a lot better than others.
If this image had been created more recently, the Action man would be having FIVE Bazookas instead of three Panzerfausts.
@UP_Hawxxeye wrote:
@BaronVonGoonAt least to me, the specialists fix a major class balance problem that was especially prevalent in BF1 and BFV with some classes being a lot better than others.
If this image had been created more recently, the Action man would be having FIVE Bazookas instead of three Panzerfausts.
@UP_Hawxxeye Going back to the BF3/4 classes would have fixed action man. Going back to BF2 classes also would have fixed action man. I argue getting rid of classes in favor of COD's create-a-class is creating far more problems that it addresses.
@ragnarok013It is the BF4 design specifically that is balanced and versatile with the classwide carbines, shotguns and DMRs + the recon C4. BF3 was less so.
But alas DICE wanted something new for the sake of something new and it still feels like an improvement from BF1/V
@UP_Hawxxeye wrote:
@ragnarok013It is the BF4 design specifically that is balanced and versatile with the classwide carbines, shotguns and DMRs + the recon C4. BF3 was less so.
But alas DICE wanted something new for the sake of something new and it still feels like an improvement from BF1/V
@UP_Hawxxeye I actually feel quite the opposite. I felt the DMRs being all class in BF4 reduced the role for the recon class and felt the SMGs being all class in BF3 was better so all classes had a CQC option which the recon class lacked in BF4. Carbines being all class was good in BF4 IMO.