Forum Discussion
BFB-Praetorian
2 years agoSeasoned Veteran
@Lady_One Not sure that holds up. BF1 had a three year development time, the same as 2042. And...well just compare the launch states. It sort of speaks for itself.
From what I can gather, post BF1 is when the exodus of Dev's began and since that time we've had BFV and 2042. I think a case could be made that we've seen a fairly solid decline in quality.
The sales since BF1 would also back that up too.
From what I can gather, post BF1 is when the exodus of Dev's began and since that time we've had BFV and 2042. I think a case could be made that we've seen a fairly solid decline in quality.
The sales since BF1 would also back that up too.
cso7777
2 years agoSeasoned Ace
@BFB-PraetorianIn many ways BF1 is the best BF-game ever made (BF4 was more fun though) and it the was last game, before the live-service-model "destroyed" the BF-franchise.
I think the devs actually matter less, the big problem is management. There are no 'gamer-soul' left in the decision-making and everything is about money at this point.
We must see what the next game does for the franchise. I think that if they disappoint once more, the franchise could end up dying.